The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrafine Electrospun Polyamide‐6 Fibers: Effect of Solution Conditions on Morphology and Average Fiber Diameter
Abstract
Summary: In the present contribution, the electrostatic spinning or electrospinning technique was used to produce ultra‐fine polyamide‐6 (PA‐6) fibers. The effects of solution conditions on the morphological appearance and the average diameter of as‐spun fibers were investigated by optical scanning (OS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques. It was shown that the solution properties (i.e. viscosity, surface tension and conductivity) were important factors characterizing the morphology of the fibers obtained. Among these three properties, solution viscosity was found to have the greatest effect. Solutions with high enough viscosities (viz. solutions at high concentrations) were necessary to produce fibers without beads. At a given concentration, fibers obtained from PA‐6 of higher molecular weights appeared to be larger in diameter, but it was observed that the average diameters of the fibers from PA‐6 of different molecular weights had a common relationship with the solution viscosities which could be approximated by an exponential growth equation. Raising the temperature of the solution during spinning resulted in the reduction of the fiber diameters with higher deposition rate, while mixing m‐cresol with formic acid to serve as a mixed solvent for PA‐6 caused the solutions to have higher viscosities which resulted in larger fiber diameters. Lastly, the addition of some inorganic salts resulted in an increase in the solution conductivity, which caused the fiber diameters to increase due to the large increase in the mass flow. Average diameter of as‐spun fibers plotted as a function of the viscosity of the solutions. magnified imageAverage diameter of as‐spun fibers plotted as a function of the viscosity of the solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites
Huang, Z.-M., Zhang, Y.-Z., Kotaki, M., & Ramakrishna, S. (2003) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0266-3538(03)00178-7 · Cited by 7,556
Nanometre diameter fibres of polymer, produced by electrospinning
Reneker, D. H., & Chun, I. (1996) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/009 · Cited by 3,520
Electrospinning process and applications of electrospun fibers
Doshi, J., & Reneker, D. H. (1995) · Journal of Electrostatics · doi:10.1016/0304-3886(95)00041-8 · Cited by 3,209
The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles
Deitzel, J. M., Kleinmeyer, J., Harris, D., & Beck Tan, N. C. (2001) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(00)00250-0 · Cited by 2,915
Beaded nanofibers formed during electrospinning
Fong, H., Chun, I., & Reneker, D. H. (1999) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(99)00068-3 · Cited by 2,553
Bending instability of electrically charged liquid jets of polymer solutions in electrospinning
Reneker, D. H., Yarin, A. L., Fong, H., & Koombhongse, S. (2000) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.373532 · Cited by 2,462
Structure and process relationship of electrospun bioabsorbable nanofiber membranes
Zong, X., Kim, K., Fang, D., Ran, S., Hsiao, B. S., & Chu, B. (2002) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(02)00275-6 · Cited by 1,893
Electrospinning of polyurethane fibers
Demir, M. M., Yilgor, I., Yilgor, E., & Erman, B. (2002) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(02)00136-2 · Cited by 1,099
Electrostatic spinning of acrylic microfibers
Baumgarten, P. K. (1971) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/0021-9797(71)90241-4 · Cited by 816
Processing and microstructural characterization of porous biocompatible protein polymer thin films
Buchko, C. J., Chen, L. C., Shen, Y., & Martin, D. C. (1999) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(98)00866-0 · Cited by 714
Cited by
Wang, X., Ding, B., Sun, G., Wang, M., & Yu, J. (2013) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.05.001 · Cited by 533
Electrospinning: Processes, Structures, and Materials
Ahmadi Bonakdar, M., & Rodrigue, D. (2024) · Macromol · doi:10.3390/macromol4010004 · Cited by 380
Kim, J. F., Kim, J. H., Lee, Y. M., & Drioli, E. (2016) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.15076 · Cited by 358
A dynamic liquid support system for continuous electrospun yarn fabrication
Teo, W.-E., Gopal, R., Ramaseshan, R., Fujihara, K., & Ramakrishna, S. (2007) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2007.04.044 · Cited by 277
Mechanical Properties of Electrospun Fibers—A Critical Review
Rashid, T. U., Gorga, R. E., & Krause, W. E. (2021) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.202100153 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Mit‐uppatham, C., Nithitanakul, M., & Supaphol, P.
- Venue
- Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11-17
- Volume
- 205
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2327-2338
- ISSN
- 1022-1352 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3935
- OpenAlex
- W2073262861
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 8.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrafine Electrospun Polyamide‐6 Fibers: Effect of Solution Conditions on Morphology and Average Fiber Diameter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/macp.200400225
- The paper
- Mit‐uppatham, C., Nithitanakul, M., & Supaphol, P. (2004). Ultrafine Electrospun Polyamide‐6 Fibers: Effect of Solution Conditions on Morphology and Average Fiber Diameter. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.200400225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.