Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Affect generalization to similar and dissimilar brand extensions; consumer behavior seminar

·1987·Psychology & Marketing

Abstract

The effects of family branding were investigated in a laboratory experiment. Results showed a tendency for the overall affect associated with the brand name, to generalize new and different products. The mediating effects of similarity (between the current and new product) on this relationship were also demonstrated. The greater the similarity between the current and new product, the greater the transfer of positive or negative affect to that new product. The data also suggested that a brand's reputation for excellence in one product area may have a negative impact on consumer ratings of new products in an unrelated product area. Marketing implications are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mar.4220040306

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Venue
Psychology & Marketing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
225-237
ISSN
  • 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6793
OpenAlex
W4241405023
Cited by
165
References
2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affect generalization to similar and dissimilar brand extensions; consumer behavior seminar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mar.4220040306
The paper
Affect generalization to similar and dissimilar brand extensions; consumer behavior seminar. (1987). Psychology & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220040306

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.