The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Synthesis and characterization of poly(phenyl‐p‐tolylphosphazene), prepared via in situ polymerization of phenyl‐p‐tolylphosphine azide
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alternative, non-ROP, routes have also been investigated, albeit with, as yet, limited commercial success.
“Thus, alternative, non-ROP, routes have also been investigated [164 -167], albeit with, as yet, limited commercial success.”
From Ring-Opening Polymerization—An Introductory Review (2013) · cites this paper as [167]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Tesi G., 1960, Proc. Chem. Soc., 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Franz, U., Nuyken, O., & Matyjaszewski, K.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Matyjaszewski, Krzysztof
- Venue
- Macromolecular Rapid Communications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-174
- ISSN
- 1022-1336 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3927
- OpenAlex
- W1971772014
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Macromolecular Rapid Communications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Organophosphorus compounds synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Keywords
- polyphosphazenes, in situ polymerization, polymer synthesis, polymer characterization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
