The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atmospheric pressure photoionization mass spectrometry
Abstract
I. Introduction and Historical Background 318 II. Short Theoretical Outline 319 A. The Use of a Dopant 319 1. APPI–MS with a Dopant 320 B. Further Parallel Reactions in APPI–MS 321 III. APPI Sources—Overview 321 A. In‐Line Geometry Source 321 B. Orthogonal Geometry Source 323 IV. Factors that Influence the Performance of APPI 323 A. The Dopant 323 B. Mobile Phase Composition 323 V. Applications 324 A. Pharmaceutical and Drug Metabolism 324 1. Non‐Steroidal Compounds 325 2. Steroidal Compounds 327 B. Environmental 327 C. Natural Products 328 D. Synthetic Organics 329 VI. Conclusions 330 Acknowledgments 330 References 330 Atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) is the last arrival in the family of atmospheric pressure ionization (API) methods to couple mass spectrometry (MS) to liquid‐phase separation techniques. The basic idea was to further extend the fields of application of liquid chromatography (LC)–MS to those molecules that are not, or are poorly amenable, to electrospray (ESI) or APCI. The present review explores the literature. After a short introduction with an historical background and the premises for its development, we describe the technique, its physical principles, and the factors that affect its efficiency. The review also presents a survey of applications in different fields. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 22:318–331, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mas.10060
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nist chemistry webbook, nist standard reference database number 69
Linstorm, P. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,606
Robb, D. B., Covey, T. R., & Bruins, A. P. (2000) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0001636 · Cited by 748
Kauppila, T. J., Kuuranne, T., Meurer, E. C., Eberlin, M. N., Kotiaho, T., & Kostiainen, R. (2002) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac025659x · Cited by 300
Leinonen, A., Kuuranne, T., & Kostiainen, R. (2002) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.328 · Cited by 193
Rauha, J., Vuorela, H., & Kostiainen, R. (2001) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.231 · Cited by 173
Cited by
Van Berkel, G. J., Pasilis, S. P., & Ovchinnikova, O. (2008) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.1440 · Cited by 299
Kyriakopoulou, L., Yazdanpanah, M., Colantonio, D. A., Chan, M. K., Daly, C. H., & Adeli, K. (2013) · Clinical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.01.002 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Raffaelli, A., & Saba, A.
- Venue
- Mass Spectrometry Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08-26
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 318-331
- ISSN
- 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2787
- OpenAlex
- W2141809233
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmospheric pressure photoionization mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.10060
- The paper
- Raffaelli, A., & Saba, A. (2003). Atmospheric pressure photoionization mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.10060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.