The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate and precise determination of isotopic ratios by MC‐ICP‐MS: A review
Abstract
For many decades the accurate and precise determination of isotope ratios has remained a very strong interest to many researchers due to its important applications in earth, environmental, biological, archeological, and medical sciences. Traditionally, thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) has been the technique of choice for achieving the highest accuracy and precision. However, recent developments in multi‐collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC‐ICP‐MS) have brought a new dimension to this field. In addition to its simple and robust sample introduction, high sample throughput, and high mass resolution, the flat‐topped peaks generated by this technique provide for accurate and precise determination of isotope ratios with precision reaching 0.001%, comparable to that achieved with TIMS. These features, in combination with the ability of the ICP source to ionize nearly all elements in the periodic table, have resulted in an increased use of MC‐ICP‐MS for such measurements in various sample matrices. To determine accurate and precise isotope ratios with MC‐ICP‐MS, utmost care must be exercised during sample preparation, optimization of the instrument, and mass bias corrections. Unfortunately, there are inconsistencies and errors evident in many MC‐ICP‐MS publications, including errors in mass bias correction models. This review examines “state‐of‐the‐art” methodologies presented in the literature for achievement of precise and accurate determinations of isotope ratios by MC‐ICP‐MS. Some general rules for such accurate and precise measurements are suggested, and calculations of combined uncertainty of the data using a few common mass bias correction models are outlined. © 2009 Crown in the right of Canada. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 28:990–1011, 2009
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Natural fractionation of 238U/235U
Weyer, S., Anbar, A. D., Gerdes, A., Gordon, G. W., Algeo, T. J., & Boyle, E. A. (2008) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2007.11.012 · Cited by 509
Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurements
Rasul, S., Kajal, A. M., & Khan, A. (2018) · Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences · doi:10.3329/jbas.v41i2.35494 · Cited by 136
Cited by
Assessment of international reference materials for isotope-ratio analysis (IUPAC Technical Report)
Brand, W. A., Coplen, T. B., Vogl, J., Rosner, M., & Prohaska, T. (2014) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1515/pac-2013-1023 · Cited by 704
Lin, J., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., & Hu, Z. (2016) · Solid Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sesci.2016.04.002 · Cited by 363
Iso-Compass: new freeware software for isotopic data reduction of LA-MC-ICP-MS
Zhang, W., Hu, Z., & Liu, Y. (2020) · Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry · doi:10.1039/d0ja00084a · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, L.
- Venue
- Mass Spectrometry Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-22
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 990-1011
- ISSN
- 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2787
- OpenAlex
- W2069300217
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate and precise determination of isotopic ratios by MC‐ICP‐MS: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.20251
- The paper
- Yang, L. (2009). Accurate and precise determination of isotopic ratios by MC‐ICP‐MS: A review. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.