The DOI matches its Crossref record; 201 of the 201 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) is a rapidly advancing molecular imaging modality that can map the spatial distribution of molecules with high chemical specificity. IMS does not require prior tagging of molecular targets and is able to measure a large number of ions concurrently in a single experiment. While this makes it particularly suited for exploratory analysis, the large amount and high‐dimensional nature of data generated by IMS techniques make automated computational analysis indispensable. Research into computational methods for IMS data has touched upon different aspects, including spectral preprocessing, data formats, dimensionality reduction, spatial registration, sample classification, differential analysis between IMS experiments, and data‐driven fusion methods to extract patterns corroborated by both IMS and other imaging modalities. In this work, we review unsupervised machine learning methods for exploratory analysis of IMS data, with particular focus on (a) factorization, (b) clustering, and (c) manifold learning. To provide a view across the various IMS modalities, we have attempted to include examples from a range of approaches including matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization, desorption electrospray ionization, and secondary ion mass spectrometry‐based IMS. This review aims to be an entry point for both (i) analytical chemists and mass spectrometry experts who want to explore computational techniques; and (ii) computer scientists and data mining specialists who want to enter the IMS field. © 2019 The Authors. Mass Spectrometry Reviews published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Mass SpecRev 00:1–47, 2019.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051
Donoho, D. L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.871582 · Cited by 23,994
(1967) · Cited by 23,719
Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987) · Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 · Cited by 21,392
Least squares quantization in PCM
Lloyd, S. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1982.1056489 · Cited by 15,836
Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding
Roweis, S. T., & Saul, L. K. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2323 · Cited by 14,965
Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization
Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44565 · Cited by 13,868
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
Cited by
Körber, A., Anthony, I. G. M., & Heeren, R. M. A. (2025) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.4c05249 · Cited by 88
Spatial pharmacology using mass spectrometry imaging
Rajbhandari, P., Neelakantan, T. V., Hosny, N., & Stockwell, B. R. (2024) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2023.11.003 · Cited by 49
Multimodal Image Fusion Offers Better Spatial Resolution for Mass Spectrometry Imaging
Guo, L., Zhu, J., Wang, K., Cheng, K.-K., Xu, J., Dong, L., Xu, X., Chen, C., Shah, M., Peng, Z., et al. (2023) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02002 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Verbeeck, N., Caprioli, R. M., & Van de Plas, R.
- Venue
- Mass Spectrometry Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-10-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-291
- ISSN
- 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2787
- OpenAlex
- W2979874034
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 201
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.21602
- The paper
- Verbeeck, N., Caprioli, R. M., & Van de Plas, R. (2020). Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.