Cited by 195Antimicrobial agents and applicationsBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingNanoparticles: synthesis and applications

Antimicrobial metallic copper surfaces kill Staphylococcus haemolyticus via membrane damage

Open access
Santo, Christophe Espírito, Quaranta, Davide, Grass, Gregor·2012·MicrobiologyOpen

Abstract

Recently, copper (Cu) in its metallic form has regained interest for its antimicrobial properties. Use of metallic Cu surfaces in worldwide hospital trials resulted in remarkable reductions in surface contaminations. Yet, our understanding of why microbes are killed upon contact to the metal is still limited and different modes of action have been proposed. This knowledge, however, is crucial for sustained use of such surfaces in hospitals and other hygiene-sensitive areas. Here, we report on the molecular mechanisms by which the Gram-positive Staphylococcus haemolyticus is inactivated by metallic Cu. Staphylococcus haemolyticus was killed within minutes on Cu but not on stainless steel demonstrating the antimicrobial efficacy of metallic Cu. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) analysis and in vivo staining with Coppersensor-1 indicated that cells accumulated large amounts of Cu ions from metallic Cu surfaces contributing to lethal damage. Mutation rates of Cu- or steel-exposed cells were similarly low. Instead, live/dead staining indicated cell membrane damage in Cu- but not steel-exposed cells. These findings support a model of the cellular targets of metallic Cu toxicity in bacteria, which suggests that metallic Cu is not genotoxic and does not kill via DNA damage. In contrast, membranes constitute the likely Achilles' heel of Cu surface-exposed cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mbo3.2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Copper exhibits a wide range of antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi and viruses.

    “Copper also exhibits a wide range of antimicrobial activity, including that against Gram-positive (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Clostridium difficile and Listeria monocytogenes) and Gram-negative (e.g., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae) bacteria, fungi (Candida albicans and Aspergillus brasiliensis) and viruses (adenovirus, norovirus and Pol”

    From Bioactive Compounds for Skin Health: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [124]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 195

Authors
Santo, C. E., Quaranta, D., & Grass, G.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Grass, Gregor
Venue
MicrobiologyOpen
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-07
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
46-52
ISSN
2045-8827 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1852894381
Cited by
195
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MicrobiologyOpen (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Copper Development Association
  • University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • International Copper Association
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20RR017675)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
Keywords
copper, antimicrobial surfaces, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, copper ions, cell membrane damage, copper accumulation, stainless steel, genotoxicity, bacterial inactivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review