The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gene expression analysis of prostate cancers
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a biologically heterogeneous disease with considerable variation in clinical aggressiveness. The behavior of prostate cancer can be considered a direct or indirect result of aberrant alterations of gene expression in prostate epithelial cells. Identification of the patterns of gene‐expression alterations that are related to the aggressiveness of prostate cancers will greatly assist the development of tools for early detection of prostate cancers with poor clinical outcome and identification of targets for future therapeutic intervention. To detect the patterns of gene‐expression alterations of prostate cancers, we performed a comprehensive gene‐expression analysis on 30 prostate tissues of various levels of invasiveness (ranging from those confined to the organ to distant metastases) and Gleason grades (combined scores 4–9), using the Affymetrix chip set Hu35k (A–D) and U95a. Following three sequential selection screens, we identified 84 largely novel genes and expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences whose expression levels were altered significantly in prostate cancer samples compared with control normal tissues. In addition, the expression levels of a group of 12 genes and EST sequences was found to be altered significantly in aggressive type of prostate cancers but not in organ‐confined prostate cancers. Cluster analysis using the 84‐gene list showed that the highly aggressive prostate cancers contained gene‐expression patterns that were distinct from organ‐confined prostate cancers. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rhodes, D. R., Yu, J., Shanker, K., Deshpande, N., Varambally, R., Ghosh, D., Barrette, T., Pandey, A., & Chinnaiyan, A. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0401994101 · Cited by 1,019
Yu, Y. P., Landsittel, D., Jing, L., Nelson, J., Ren, B., Liu, L., McDonald, C., Thomas, R., Dhir, R., Finkelstein, S., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.05.158 · Cited by 758
Self-citationImmunosuppressive plasma cells impede T-cell-dependent immunogenic chemotherapy
Shalapour, S., Font-Burgada, J., Di Caro, G., Zhong, Z., Sanchez-Lopez, E., Dhar, D., Willimsky, G., Ammirante, M., Strasner, A., Hansel, D. E., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14395 · Cited by 611
microRNA-21 negatively regulates Cdc25A and cell cycle progression in colon cancer cells
Wang, P., Zou, F., Zhang, X., Li, H., Dulak, A., Tomko, R. J., Lazo, J. S., Wang, Z., Zhang, L., & Yu, J. (2009) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-1996 · Cited by 308
Wang, G., Lunardi, A., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Ala, U., Webster, K. A., Tay, Y., Gonzalez-Billalabeitia, E., Egia, A., Shaffer, D. R., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2654 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, J., Yu, Y. P., Cieply, K., Lin, F., Deflavia, P., Dhir, R., Finkelstein, S., Michalopoulos, G., & Becich, M.
- Venue
- Molecular Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-35
- ISSN
- 0899-1987 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2744
- OpenAlex
- W2104096208
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene expression analysis of prostate cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mc.10018
- The paper
- Luo, J., Yu, Y. P., Cieply, K., Lin, F., Deflavia, P., Dhir, R., Finkelstein, S., Michalopoulos, G., & Becich, M. (2002). Gene expression analysis of prostate cancers. Molecular Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.10018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.