Cited by 23Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Clinical benefit of neoadjuvant anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 utilization among different tumors

Open access
Li, Zhiyang, Wu, Xin, Zhao, Yanjie, Xiao, Yinan, Zhao, Yunuo, Zhang, Ting, Li, Hui, Sha, Fushen +3 more·2021·MedComm

Abstract

PD‐1/PD‐L1 (programmed cell death‐1 and programmed death‐ligand 1) inhibitors utilization in neoadjuvant therapy has been assessed in tumors. This study focused on the clinical benefits of neoadjuvant anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 therapy. A comprehensive search was conducted in electronic databases to identify eligible studies. Major response rate (MRR) and complete response rate (CRR) were pooled in this analysis to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 utilization, all grades and high‐grade adverse events (AEs) were pooled to evaluate its safety. Twenty studies were included in this meta‐analysis, with 828 patients suffering from different tumors. The pooled CRR of triple‐negative breast cancer was 0.569 (95% CI 0.514, 0.624, I2 = 0%) and the pooled MRR of lung cancer was 0.471 (95% CI 0.267, 0.575, I2 = 0%). The most frequent adverse event was fatigue (0.272 95% CI 0.171, 0.402, I2 = 87%), and the most common high‐grade adverse event was febrile neutropenia (0.084 95% CI 0.063, 0.112, I2 = 85%). In conclusion, neoadjuvant anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 therapy received satisfactory clinical results in these tumors included.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mco2.61

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 23

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [45]Review Manager (RevMan) [computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2014.

Authors
Li, Z., Wu, X., Zhao, Y., Xiao, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhang, T., Li, H., Sha, F., Wang, Y., Deng, L., & Ma, X.
Affiliations
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
  • State University of New York (US)
  • Weiss Memorial Hospital (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Ma, Xuelei
Venue
MedComm
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
60-68
ISSN
2688-2663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3138565626
Cited by
23
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MedComm (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
neoadjuvant therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, immune checkpoint inhibitors, triple-negative breast cancer, lung cancer, complete response rate, adverse events, fatigue, febrile neutropenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review