Cited by 87Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological disorders and treatmentsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Direct visualization of Parkinson's disease by in vivo human brain imaging using 7.0T magnetic resonance imaging

Cho, Zang‐Hee, Oh, Se‐Hong, Kim, Jong‐Min, Park, Sung‐Yeon, Kwon, Dae‐Hyuk, Jeong, Hye‐Jin, Kim, Young‐Bo, Chi, Je‐Geun +4 more·2011·Movement Disorders

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder resulting from progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (SN) pars compacta. Therefore, imaging of the SN has been regarded to hold greatest potential for use in the diagnosis of PD. At the 7.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it is now possible to delineate clearly the shapes and boundaries of the SN. We scanned eight early and two advanced PD patients, along with nine age-matched control subjects, using a 7.0T MRI in an attempt to directly visualize the SN and quantify the differences in shape and boundaries of SN between PD subjects in comparison with the normal control subjects. In the normal controls, the boundaries between the SN and crus cerebri appear smooth, and clean "arch" shapes that stretch ventrally from posterior to anterior. In contrast, these smooth and clean arch-like boundaries were lost in PD subjects. The measured correlation analyses show that, in PD patients, there is age-dependent correlation and substantially stronger UPDRS motor score-dependent correlation. These results suggest that, by using 7.0T MRI, it appears possible to use these visible and distinctive changes in morphology as a diagnostic marker of PD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.23465

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The characteristic iron accumulation in the substantia nigra of individuals with Parkinson's disease can be detected in vivo with MRI.

    “The characteristic iron accumulation in the substantia nigra of individuals with Parkinson’s disease can be detected in vivo with MRI143 (figure 2).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 155 · Cited by 87

Authors
Cho, Z., Oh, S., Kim, J., Park, S., Kwon, D., Jeong, H., Kim, Y., Chi, J., Park, C., Huston, J., Lee, K. H., & Jeon, B. S.
Affiliations
  • Gachon University (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Cho, Zang‐Hee
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-21
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
713-718
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2069339609
Cited by
87
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Movement Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, substantia nigra, high-field MRI, dopaminergic neuron loss, UPDRS motor score, age-related changes, diagnostic biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Substantia Nigra, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review