Direct visualization of Parkinson's disease by in vivo human brain imaging using 7.0T magnetic resonance imaging
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder resulting from progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (SN) pars compacta. Therefore, imaging of the SN has been regarded to hold greatest potential for use in the diagnosis of PD. At the 7.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it is now possible to delineate clearly the shapes and boundaries of the SN. We scanned eight early and two advanced PD patients, along with nine age-matched control subjects, using a 7.0T MRI in an attempt to directly visualize the SN and quantify the differences in shape and boundaries of SN between PD subjects in comparison with the normal control subjects. In the normal controls, the boundaries between the SN and crus cerebri appear smooth, and clean "arch" shapes that stretch ventrally from posterior to anterior. In contrast, these smooth and clean arch-like boundaries were lost in PD subjects. The measured correlation analyses show that, in PD patients, there is age-dependent correlation and substantially stronger UPDRS motor score-dependent correlation. These results suggest that, by using 7.0T MRI, it appears possible to use these visible and distinctive changes in morphology as a diagnostic marker of PD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The characteristic iron accumulation in the substantia nigra of individuals with Parkinson's disease can be detected in vivo with MRI.
“The characteristic iron accumulation in the substantia nigra of individuals with Parkinson’s disease can be detected in vivo with MRI143 (figure 2).”
From The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders (2014) · cites this paper as [143]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 155 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- Cho, Z., Oh, S., Kim, J., Park, S., Kwon, D., Jeong, H., Kim, Y., Chi, J., Park, C., Huston, J., Lee, K. H., & Jeon, B. S.
- Affiliations
- Gachon University (KR)
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cho, Zang‐Hee
- ORCID
- Venue
- Movement Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-21
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 713-718
- ISSN
- 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8257
- OpenAlex
- W2069339609
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 155
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Movement Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, substantia nigra, high-field MRI, dopaminergic neuron loss, UPDRS motor score, age-related changes, diagnostic biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Substantia Nigra, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review