Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Two‐year, randomized, controlled study of safinamide as add‐on to levodopa in mid to late Parkinson's disease

Open access
Borgohain, Rupam, Szasz, Jozsef, Stanzione, Paolo, Meshram, Chandrashekhar, Bhatt, Mohit H., Chirilineau, Dana, Stocchi, Fabrizio, Lucini, Valentina, Giuliani, Rodolfo, Forrest, Emma, Rice, Patricia, Anand, Ravi, the Study 018 Investigators·2014·Movement Disorders

Abstract

In a 6‐month double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations, safinamide 50 and 100 mg/d significantly increased ON‐time without increasing dyskinesia. Further long‐term safinamide use in these patients was evaluated over an additional 18 months. Patients continued on their randomized placebo, 50, or 100 mg/d safinamide. The primary endpoint was change in Dyskinesia Rating Scale total score during ON‐time over 24 months. Other efficacy endpoints included change in ON‐time without troublesome dyskinesia, changes in individual diary categories, depressive symptoms, and quality of life measures. Change in Dyskinesia Rating Scale was not significantly different in safinamide versus placebo groups, despite decreased mean total Dyskinesia Rating Scale with safinamide compared with an almost unchanged score in placebo. Ad hoc subgroup analysis of moderate to severe dyskinetic patients at baseline (36% of patients) showed a decrease with safinamide 100 mg/d compared with placebo (P = 0.0317). Improvements in motor function, activities of daily living, depressive symptoms, clinical status, and quality of life at 6 months remained significant at 24 months. Adverse events and discontinuation rates were similar with safinamide and placebo. This 2‐year, controlled study of add‐on safinamide in mid‐to‐late Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations, although not demonstrating an overall difference in dyskinesias between patients and controls, showed improvement in dyskinesia in patients at least moderately dyskinetic at baseline. The study additionally demonstrated significant clinical benefits in ON‐time (without troublesome dyskinesia), OFF‐time, activities of daily living, motor symptoms, quality of life, and symptoms of depression. © 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.25961

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Borgohain, R., Szasz, J., Stanzione, P., Meshram, C., Bhatt, M. H., Chirilineau, D., Stocchi, F., Lucini, V., Giuliani, R., Forrest, E., Rice, P., Anand, R., & the Study 018 Investigators
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-10
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1273-1280
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W1547633323
Cited by
234
References
0
FWCI
11.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two‐year, randomized, controlled study of safinamide as add‐on to levodopa in mid to late Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.25961
The paper
Borgohain, R., Szasz, J., Stanzione, P., Meshram, C., Bhatt, M. H., Chirilineau, D., Stocchi, F., Lucini, V., Giuliani, R., Forrest, E., Rice, P., Anand, R., & the Study 018 Investigators. (2014). Two‐year, randomized, controlled study of safinamide as add‐on to levodopa in mid to late Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25961

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.