Molecular changes in the absence of severe pathology in the pulvinar in dementia with Lewy bodies
Open accessAbstract
Background: Dementia with Lewy bodies is characterized by transient clinical features, including fluctuating cognition and visual hallucinations, implicating dysfunction of cerebral hub regions, such as the pulvinar nuclei of the thalamus. However, the pulvinar is typically only mildly affected by Lewy body pathology in dementia with Lewy bodies, suggesting additional factors may account for its proposed dysfunction. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of postmortem pulvinar tissue using whole‐transcriptome RNA sequencing, protein expression analysis, and histological evaluation. Results: We identified 321 transcripts as significantly different between dementia with Lewy bodies cases and neurologically normal controls, with gene ontology pathway analysis suggesting the enrichment of transcripts related to synapses and positive regulation of immune functioning. At the protein level, proteins related to synaptic efficiency were decreased, and general synaptic markers remained intact. Analysis of glial subpopulations revealed astrogliosis without activated microglia, which was associated with synaptic changes but not neurodegenerative pathology. Discussion: These results indicate that the pulvinar, a region with relatively low Lewy body pathological burden, manifests changes at the molecular level that differ from previous reports in a more severely affected region. We speculate that these alterations result from neurodegenerative changes in regions connected to the pulvinar and likely contribute to a variety of cognitive changes resulting from decreased cortical synchrony in dementia with Lewy bodies. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transcriptomic and protein expression analyses of postmortem brain tissue in DLB did not reveal significant microglial activation.
“Also, transcriptomic and protein expression analyses of postmortem brain tissue in DLB did not reveal significant microglial activation.”
From Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets (2023) · cites this paper as [419]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 40
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [2]McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium [published online ahead of print June 9, 2017]. Neurology. PMC5496518 28592453
- [27]Jones EG. The Thalamus. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012 Cambridge, UK.
- [50]Erskine D, Thomas AJ, Attems J, Specific patterns of neuronal loss in the pulvinar nucleus in dementia with lewy bodies. Mov Disord 2017; 32(3): 414– 422. 28059471
- Authors
- Erskine, D., Ding, J., Thomas, A. J., Kaganovich, A., Khundakar, A. A., Hanson, P. S., Taylor, J., McKeith, I. G., Attems, J., Cookson, M. R., & Morris, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Teesside University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Erskine, Daniel
- ORCID
- Venue
- Movement Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03-23
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 982-991
- ISSN
- 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8257
- PMC
- PMC6172958
- OpenAlex
- W2790555617
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Movement Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- TeesRep (Teesside University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging
- NIHR
- NIH
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- dementia with Lewy bodies, pulvinar, thalamus, Lewy bodies, transcriptome, synaptic dysfunction, astrocyte activation, microglia, neuroinflammation, cortical synchronization, visual hallucinations, cognitive fluctuations
- MeSH terms
- Chitinase-3-Like Protein 1, Acetyltransferases, Diagnosis, Female, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Glutamate Decarboxylase, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, RNA, Messenger, Cohort Studies, Gene Expression, Synaptophysin, HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins, Pulvinar, Lewy Body Disease, Dynamins, Syntaxin 1, alpha-Synuclein, N-Ethylmaleimide-Sensitive Proteins, Gene Ontology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review