Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 412

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selection criteria for drug‐like compounds

Open access
Muegge, Ingo·2003·Medicinal Research Reviews

Abstract

The fast identification of quality lead compounds in the pharmaceutical industry through a combination of high throughput synthesis and screening has become more challenging in recent years. Although the number of available compounds for high throughput screening (HTS) has dramatically increased, large‐scale random combinatorial libraries have contributed proportionally less to identify novel leads for drug discovery projects. Therefore, the concept of ‘drug‐likeness’ of compound selections has become a focus in recent years. In parallel, the low success rate of converting lead compounds into drugs often due to unfavorable pharmacokinetic parameters has sparked a renewed interest in understanding more clearly what makes a compound drug‐like. Various approaches have been devised to address the drug‐likeness of molecules employing retrospective analyses of known drug collections as well as attempting to capture ‘chemical wisdom’ in algorithms. For example, simple property counting schemes, machine learning methods, regression models, and clustering methods have been employed to distinguish between drugs and non‐drugs. Here we review computational techniques to address the drug‐likeness of compound selections and offer an outlook for the further development of the field. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Med Res Rev, 23, No. 3, 302‐321, 2003

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/med.10041

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 412

Metadata

Authors
Muegge, I.
Venue
Medicinal Research Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01-30
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
302-321
ISSN
  • 0198-6325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1128
OpenAlex
W2170492999
Cited by
412
References
3
FWCI
19.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection criteria for drug‐like compounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/med.10041
The paper
Muegge, I. (2003). Selection criteria for drug‐like compounds. Medicinal Research Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.10041

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.