CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 126Library Science and Information LiteracyInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorWeb and Library Services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“I still like Google”: University student perceptions of searching OPACs and the web

Open access
Fast, Karl V., Campbell, D. Grant·2004·Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
DOI 10.1002/meet.1450410116
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper reports on an exploratory study of how university students perceive and interact with Web search engines compared to Web‐based OPACs. A qualitative study was conducted involving sixteen students, eight of whom were first‐year undergraduates and eight of whom were graduate students in Library and Information Science. The participants performed searches on Google and on a university OPAC. The interviews and think‐afters revealed that while students were aware of the problems inherent in Web searching and of the many ways in which OPACS are more organized, they generally preferred Web searching. The coding of the data suggests that the reason for this preference lies in psychological factors associated with the comparative ease with which search engines can be used, and system and interface factors which made searching the Web much easier and less confusing. As a result of these factors, students were able to approach even the drawbacks of the Web—its clutter of irrelevant pages and the dubious authority of the results—in an enthusiastic and proactive manner, very different from the passive and ineffectual admiration they expressed for the OPAC. The findings suggest that requirements of good OPAC interface design must be aggressively redefined in the face of new, Web‐based standards of usability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/meet.1450410116

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 18 references

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Google. (2000 July 13).Google's Success Story Continues: Google Ranked No. 1 in NPD Search & Portal Scorecard Measuring Loyalty and Satisfaction. Available: <http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/pressrelease29.html>.
  2. Pearrow M., 2000, Web site usability handook
  3. Rubin J., 1994, Handbook of usability testing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–126 of 126

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Fast, K. V., & Campbell, D. G.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
ORCID
Campbell, D. Grant
Venue
Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
138-146
ISSN
  • 0044-7870 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-8390
DOI
10.1002/meet.1450410116
OpenAlex
W2062551457
Cited by
126
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
18.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 630 d)
Locations
Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
Keywords
university students, search engines, OPAC, student perceptions, Google, usability, interface design, information seeking, library catalog searching, think-aloud

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review