The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance of various techniques in estimating missing climatological data over snowbound mountainous areas of Karakoram Himalaya
Open accessAbstract
Filling gaps in climate data concerning mountainous areas with high spatial variability is significantly important since gaps tend to decrease the accuracy of trend estimation. In this study, the performance of seven classical methods in estimating missing values of maximum temperature, minimum temperature and precipitation at different time scales, i.e. daily (with different cases of missing data), weekly, biweekly and monthly, over Karakoram Himalaya was evaluated. Four performance indicators, i.e. mean absolute error, root mean squared error, co‐efficient of efficiency and skill score, were used to evaluate the relative performance of the methods; the mean absolute error was preferred over the other three measures for selecting the best method. The results indicate that multiple linear regression using the least absolute deviation criterion is best suited for estimation of all variables at all temporal scales except monthly precipitation data. It was also found that, for any variable, the deviation from the observed values decreased with increasing time step, i.e. there was more deviation on a daily scale than monthly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple linear regression based on the least absolute deviation (MLAD) criteria performs better than many interpolation methods such as IDW, NR, and optimal interpolation in infilling/reconstruction.
“Previous studies have shown that multiple linear regression based on the least absolute deviation (MLAD) criteria performs better than many interpolation methods such as IDW, NR, and optimal interpolation in infilling/reconstruction (Eischeid et al., 2000; Kanda et al., 2018).”
From SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset for North America from 1979 to 2018 (2020) · cites this paper as Kanda et al., 2018
The Discussion (section 5.2; page unavailable) reports that IDW performed worst and that the normal ratio method (NRM) was less effective than MLAD. The Conclusions (section 6; page unavailable) say MLAD generally performed best for estimating missing temperature and precipitation values, except for monthly precipitation. The Introduction mentions optimal interpolation but does not compare its performance with MLAD, so that part of the attributed claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMLAD has been well documented with better performance in gap infilling than other interpolation methods.
“MLAD has been well documented with better performance in gap infilling than other interpolation methods (Eischeid et al., 1995, 2000; Kanda et al., 2018; Young, 1992).”
From SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset for North America from 1979 to 2018 (2020) · cites this paper as Kanda et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 53
- 10.4324/9780203424957_chapter_1 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1005380714349 · DOI
- 10.1080/07055900.1989.9649350 · DOI
- 10.5194/gmd-6-1831-2013 · DOI
- Chatterjee A, 2013, Background error covariance estimation for atmospheric CO2 data assimilation, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 10140, 10.1002/jgrd.50654 · DOI
- Chow VT, 1988, Applied Hydrology
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1959)087<0367:AOOAS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10661-009-1012-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1175/1520-0450-34.2.371 · DOI
- Dingman SL, 2002, Physical Hydrology, 646
- 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<2809:EOMDOE>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2787:TQCOLT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1002/met.271 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0477(1981)062<0599:JAQMP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Geiger R, 1965, The Climate Near the Ground, 277
- Griffith DA, 1987, Spatial Autocorrelation: A Primer, 82
- 10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031<0677:PEIMTU>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031<0661:PEIMTU>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0168-1923(94)90067-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0168-1923(94)05077-J · DOI
- Huth R, 1995, Estimation of missing daily temperature: can a weather categorization improve its accuracy, J. Appl. Meteorol., 34, 1901
- 10.1007/s00382-012-1539-1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00477-011-0536-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1587:EMDMAM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/1998WR900018 · DOI
- McCuen RH, 1998, Hydrologic Analysis and Design, 814
- 10.1029/2005JD005858 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1988)116<2417:SSBOTM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/joc.4846 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1952)080<0129:IOMPR>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.5194/gmd-6-353-2013 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<0853:AOICDE>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- ShepardD.1968. A two‐dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced data.Proceedings of 1968 ACM National Conference New York NY ACM'68;517–524. · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1524:TEODGO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Sullivan DO, 2003, Geographical Information Analysis
- 10.1002/joc.3370030308 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00089.1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.015 · DOI · Paper page
- Thiebaux HJ, 1987, Spatial Objective Analysis with Applications in Atmospheric Science, 299
- 10.1007/BF02278328 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:10(1386) · DOI
- 10.1016/j.marstruc.2007.12.001 · DOI
- Vasiliev IR, 1996, Practical Handbook of Spatial Statistics
- 10.1029/91WR00977 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2577:SIOAAA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.005 · DOI
- 10.1029/91GL02844 · DOI
- 10.1002/joc.3370140405 · DOI
- 10.1559/152304085783914686 · DOI
- World Meteorological Organization, 2011, Guide to Climatological Practices
- 10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00056-8 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<2561:ATWMFI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset for North America from 1979 to 2018
Tang, G., Clark, M. P., Newman, A. J., Wood, A. W., Papalexiou, S. M., Vionnet, V., & Whitfield, P. H. (2020) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-12-2381-2020 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Kanda, N., Negi, H. S., Rishi, M. S., & Shekhar, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Snow & Avalanche Study Estt (IN)
- Panjab University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kanda, Neha
- Venue
- Meteorological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-29
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 337-349
- ISSN
- 1350-4827 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8080
- OpenAlex
- W2769575588
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Meteorological Applications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Defence Research and Development Organisation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
- Keywords
- missing data estimation, mountain climate, Karakoram Himalaya, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, precipitation, multiple linear regression, least absolute deviation, time step size, spatial variability, skill scores, mean absolute error
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review