Cited by 49Precipitation Measurement and AnalysisClimate variability and modelsCryospheric studies and observations

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Performance of various techniques in estimating missing climatological data over snowbound mountainous areas of Karakoram Himalaya

Open access
Kanda, Neha, Negi, H. S., Rishi, Madhuri S., Shekhar, M. S.·2018·Meteorological Applications

Abstract

Filling gaps in climate data concerning mountainous areas with high spatial variability is significantly important since gaps tend to decrease the accuracy of trend estimation. In this study, the performance of seven classical methods in estimating missing values of maximum temperature, minimum temperature and precipitation at different time scales, i.e. daily (with different cases of missing data), weekly, biweekly and monthly, over Karakoram Himalaya was evaluated. Four performance indicators, i.e. mean absolute error, root mean squared error, co‐efficient of efficiency and skill score, were used to evaluate the relative performance of the methods; the mean absolute error was preferred over the other three measures for selecting the best method. The results indicate that multiple linear regression using the least absolute deviation criterion is best suited for estimation of all variables at all temporal scales except monthly precipitation data. It was also found that, for any variable, the deviation from the observed values decreased with increasing time step, i.e. there was more deviation on a daily scale than monthly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/met.1699

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple linear regression based on the least absolute deviation (MLAD) criteria performs better than many interpolation methods such as IDW, NR, and optimal interpolation in infilling/reconstruction.

    “Previous studies have shown that multiple linear regression based on the least absolute deviation (MLAD) criteria performs better than many interpolation methods such as IDW, NR, and optimal interpolation in infilling/reconstruction (Eischeid et al., 2000; Kanda et al., 2018).”

    From SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset for North America from 1979 to 2018 (2020) · cites this paper as Kanda et al., 2018

    The Discussion (section 5.2; page unavailable) reports that IDW performed worst and that the normal ratio method (NRM) was less effective than MLAD. The Conclusions (section 6; page unavailable) say MLAD generally performed best for estimating missing temperature and precipitation values, except for monthly precipitation. The Introduction mentions optimal interpolation but does not compare its performance with MLAD, so that part of the attributed claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MLAD has been well documented with better performance in gap infilling than other interpolation methods.

    “MLAD has been well documented with better performance in gap infilling than other interpolation methods (Eischeid et al., 1995, 2000; Kanda et al., 2018; Young, 1992).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 10.4324/9780203424957_chapter_1 · DOI
  2. 10.1023/A:1005380714349 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/07055900.1989.9649350 · DOI
  4. 10.5194/gmd-6-1831-2013 · DOI
  5. Chatterjee A, 2013, Background error covariance estimation for atmospheric CO2 data assimilation, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 10140, 10.1002/jgrd.50654 · DOI
  6. Chow VT, 1988, Applied Hydrology
  7. 10.1175/1520-0493(1959)087<0367:AOOAS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s10661-009-1012-8 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1175/1520-0450-34.2.371 · DOI
  10. Dingman SL, 2002, Physical Hydrology, 646
  11. 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<2809:EOMDOE>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  12. 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2787:TQCOLT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/met.271 · DOI
  14. 10.1175/1520-0477(1981)062<0599:JAQMP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  15. Geiger R, 1965, The Climate Near the Ground, 277
  16. Griffith DA, 1987, Spatial Autocorrelation: A Primer, 82
  17. 10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031<0677:PEIMTU>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  18. 10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031<0661:PEIMTU>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0168-1923(94)90067-1 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0168-1923(94)05077-J · DOI
  21. Huth R, 1995, Estimation of missing daily temperature: can a weather categorization improve its accuracy, J. Appl. Meteorol., 34, 1901
  22. 10.1007/s00382-012-1539-1 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s00477-011-0536-y · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1587:EMDMAM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  25. 10.1029/1998WR900018 · DOI
  26. McCuen RH, 1998, Hydrologic Analysis and Design, 814
  27. 10.1029/2005JD005858 · DOI
  28. 10.1175/1520-0493(1988)116<2417:SSBOTM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/joc.4846 · DOI
  31. 10.1175/1520-0493(1952)080<0129:IOMPR>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  32. 10.5194/gmd-6-353-2013 · DOI
  33. 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<0853:AOICDE>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  34. ShepardD.1968. A two‐dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced data.Proceedings of 1968 ACM National Conference New York NY ACM'68;517–524. · DOI
  35. 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1524:TEODGO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  36. Sullivan DO, 2003, Geographical Information Analysis
  37. 10.1002/joc.3370030308 · DOI
  38. 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00089.1 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.015 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Thiebaux HJ, 1987, Spatial Objective Analysis with Applications in Atmospheric Science, 299
  41. 10.1007/BF02278328 · DOI
  42. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:10(1386) · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2007.12.001 · DOI
  44. Vasiliev IR, 1996, Practical Handbook of Spatial Statistics
  45. 10.1029/91WR00977 · DOI
  46. 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2577:SIOAAA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.005 · DOI
  48. 10.1029/91GL02844 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/joc.3370140405 · DOI
  50. 10.1559/152304085783914686 · DOI
  51. World Meteorological Organization, 2011, Guide to Climatological Practices
  52. 10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00056-8 · DOI
  53. 10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<2561:ATWMFI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kanda, N., Negi, H. S., Rishi, M. S., & Shekhar, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Snow & Avalanche Study Estt (IN)
  • Panjab University (IN)
Corresponding author
Kanda, Neha
Venue
Meteorological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-29
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
337-349
ISSN
  • 1350-4827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8080
OpenAlex
W2769575588
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Meteorological Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defence Research and Development Organisation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
Keywords
missing data estimation, mountain climate, Karakoram Himalaya, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, precipitation, multiple linear regression, least absolute deviation, time step size, spatial variability, skill scores, mean absolute error

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review