Bridging language models and computational materials science: A prompt-driven framework for material property prediction
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated effectiveness in interpreting complex data. However, they encounter challenges in specialized applications, such as predicting material properties, due to limited integration with domain‐specific knowledge. To overcome these challenges, we introduce MatAgent, an artificial intelligence (AI) agent that combines computational chemistry tools, such as first‐principles (FP) calculations, with the capabilities of LLMs to predict key properties of materials. By leveraging prompt engineering and advanced reasoning techniques, MatAgent integrates a series of tools and acquires domain‐specific knowledge in the field of material property prediction, enabling it to accurately predict the properties of materials without the need for predefined input structures. The experimental results indicate that MatAgent achieves a significant improvement in prediction accuracy and efficiency. As a novel approach that integrates LLMs with FP calculation tools, MatAgent highlights the potential of combining advanced computational techniques to enhance material property predictions, representing a significant advancement in computational materials science.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A third group relied on more compact planner-executor or single-agent loops that repeatedly called tools and updated decisions from the observed outputs.
“A third group relied on more compact planner-executor or single-agent loops that repeatedly called tools and updated decisions from the observed outputs [24,28,29,32-34,39,40].”
From From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
MatAgent completed 94-96% of property-retrieval tasks and 89-91% of property-prediction tasks across three 100-question rounds.
“MatAgent completed 94-96% of property-retrieval tasks and 89-91% of property-prediction tasks across three 100-question rounds [40].”
From From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
Some studies are simulator-native: the agent configures or executes atomistic or thermodynamic tools directly.
“Some studies are simulator-native: the agent configures or executes atomistic or thermodynamic tools directly [21,25,28,29,31,33,36,38-42].”
From From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Lv, S., Peng, L., Wu, W., Yao, Y., Jiao, S., & Hu, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Hu, Wei
- Venue
- Materials Genome Engineering Advances
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-05-27
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2940-9489 (ISSN-L)
- 2940-9497
- OpenAlex
- W4410775580
- Semantic Scholar
- e1c7944be67ffcffcaf45eed3180c9c816607a9c
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Materials Genome Engineering Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- large language models, materials property prediction, prompt engineering, AI agents, first-principles calculations, computational materials science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review