Cited by 82Computational Drug Discovery MethodsImbalanced Data Classification TechniquesMachine Learning and Data Classification

Classifiers and their Metrics Quantified

Open access
Brown, J. B.·2018·Molecular Informatics

Abstract

Molecular modeling frequently constructs classification models for the prediction of two‐class entities, such as compound bio(in)activity, chemical property (non)existence, protein (non)interaction, and so forth. The models are evaluated using well known metrics such as accuracy or true positive rates. However, these frequently used metrics applied to retrospective and/or artificially generated prediction datasets can potentially overestimate true performance in actual prospective experiments. Here, we systematically consider metric value surface generation as a consequence of data balance, and propose the computation of an inverse cumulative distribution function taken over a metric surface. The proposed distribution analysis can aid in the selection of metrics when formulating study design. In addition to theoretical analyses, a practical example in chemogenomic virtual screening highlights the care required in metric selection and interpretation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/minf.201700127

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 82

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [20]J. D. Hunter, Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007, 9, 90– 95.
  2. [21]C. Cortes, V. Vapnik, Mach. Learn. 1995, 20, 273– 297.
  3. [22]L. Breiman, Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5– 32.
  4. [28]C. Rakers, D. Reker, J. B. Brown, J. Comput. Aided Chem. 2017, 8, 124– 142.
  5. [29]J. Cohen, Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1960, 20, 37– 46.

Authors
Brown, J. B.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Brown, J. B.
Venue
Molecular Informatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01
Volume
37
Issue
1-2
ISSN
  • 1868-1743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-1751
OpenAlex
W2791704581
Cited by
82
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (16H06306, 17 K20043)
  • Kyoto University Ishizue research support program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
binary classification, class imbalance, quantile function, research design, bioactivity prediction, protein-protein interaction prediction, chemical property prediction
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Models, Chemical, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Small Molecule Libraries, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review