Cited by 24Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Size matters – Analysis of shell repair scars in endocerid cephalopods

Open access
Kröger, B.·2011·Fossil Record

Abstract

Nearly one third of all conchs of Anthoceras buchi (Lesnikowa, 1949) from Baltoscandia display healed apertural breakages. Often multiple of these repair scars can be found in single conchs. Most of the scars are less than 2 mm deep, but deeper slit-like repaired breakages occasionally occur. Small injuries are usually around the entire apertural circumference, but the larger scars are concentrated at the ventral side of the conch, which is interpreted as result of a protection from a hood. The adult diameter of Anthoceras buchi is > 40 mm. Conch regions that exceed 30 mm in diameter rarely contain evidence of multiple repair scars. The relative frequency of deep healed breakages is highest at regions with diameters of 25–30 mm. This pattern is interpreted as evidence for a size limitation of the predator: large specimens with conch diameters above 30 mm had a considerably lower risk to get injured and the preserved injuries were less severe. This potentially explains the strong evolutionary trend of size increase in endocerids during the Lower to Middle Ordovician as escalation between them and shell breaking predators. Additionally, a specimen of Anthoceras buchi is described and figured, which displays colour marks with a mottled pattern. doi:10.1002/mmng.201100001

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/fr-14-109-2011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large paired injuries in Ordovician nautiloids might have been caused by shell-breaking predators including nautiloids and eurypterids.

    “Large paired injuries in Ordovician nautiloids might have been caused by shell-breaking predators including nautiloids and eurypterids (Kröger 2005), although the culprits are hard to pin down (Kröger 2005, 2011).”

    From Palaeozoic evolution of animal mouthparts (2017) · cites this paper as Kröger 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Alexander, R. R. & Dietl, G. P. 2003. The fossil record of shell- breaking predation on marine bivalves and gastropods. In Kelley, P. H., Kowalewski, H. & Hansen, T. A. (eds). Predator-prey inter- actions in the fossil record. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York: pp. 141-176.
  2. Ebbestad, J. O. R. 1998. Multiple attempted predation in the Middle Ordovician gastropod Bucania gracillima. -GFF 120 (1): 27-33.
  3. Ebbestad, J. O. R. & Peel, J. S. 1997. Attempted predation and shell repair in Middle and Upper Ordovician gastropods from Swe- den. -Journal of Paleontology 71: 1007-1019.
  4. Ebbestad, J. O. R. & Stott, C. A. 2008. Failed predation in Late Ordo- vician gastropods from Manitoulin Island, Ontario, Canada. -Ca- nadian Journal of Earth Sciences 45: 231-241.
  5. Frisk, â. M. & Ebbestad, J. O. R. 2007. Paragastropoda, Tergomya and Gastropoda (Mollusca) from the Upper Ordovician Dalby Limestone, Sweden. -GFF 129 (2): 83-99.
  6. Harper, E., Peck, L. & Hendry, K. 2009. Patterns of shell repair in articulate brachiopods indicate size constitutes a refuge from pre- dation. -Marine Biology 156 (10): 1993-2000.
  7. Hengsbach, R. 1996. Ammonoid pathology. In Landman, N. H., Ta- nabe, K. & Davis, R. A. (eds). Ammonoid Paleobiology. Plenum Press, New York: pp. 581-605.
  8. Ivantsov, A. J. 2003. Ordovician Trilobites of the Subfamily Asaphi- nae, of the Ladoga Glint. -Paleontological Journal 37 (Supple- ment 3): 229-336.
  9. Keupp, H. 1998. Mundsaumverletzungen bei Pleuroceras (Ammonoi- dea). -Fossilien 1998 (1): 37-42.
  10. Kræger, B. 2002. Antipredatory traits of the ammonoid shell -Indi- cations from Jurassic ammonoids with sublethal injuries. -Palå- ontologische Zeitschrift 76 (2): 223-234.
  11. Leighton, L. R. 2002. Inferring predation intensity in the marine fossil record. -Paleobiology 28 (3): 328-342.
  12. Schlotheim, E. F. von. 1813. Beitråge zur Naturgeschichte der Verstei- nerungen in geognostischer Hinsicht. -Leonards Taschenbuch 7 (1): 3-134.
  13. Stouge, S. 2004. Ordovician siliciclastics and carbonates of Úland. - International Symposium on Early Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Palaeoclimate, 5, Erlanger Geologische Abhandlungen, Son- derband: 91-111.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kröger, B.
Affiliations
Museum für Naturkunde (DE)
Corresponding author
Kröger, B.
Venue
Fossil Record
Published
2011-08-01
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
109-118
ISSN
  • 1860-1014 (ISSN-L)
  • 2193-0074
OpenAlex
W2136698155
Cited by
24
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Fossil record (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Ordovician cephalopods, Baltoscandia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review