Urinary N‐methylpyridinium and trigonelline as candidate dietary biomarkers of coffee consumption
Abstract
SCOPE: In order to validate the in vivo function of putatively healthy molecules in foods, human intervention studies are required. As the subject's compliance concerning intake or abstinence of a given food is considered mandatory to be monitored by biomarkers, the objective was to identify analytical markers for coffee consumption. METHODS AND RESULTS: Urine samples collected from coffee drinkers were compared with those of non-coffee drinkers using hydrophilic liquid interaction chromatography (HILIC)/time-of-flight mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling. Two urinary molecules, found to be contributing most to the dissimilarities between both groups, were identified as N-methylpyridinium (NMP) and trigonelline and their suitability as coffee-specific biomarkers was validated by means of a coffee intervention study. After the volunteers (five females and four males) consumed a single dose of coffee, morning urine was collected for 10 days while staying abstinent from any coffee. HILIC-MS/MS-stable isotope dilution analysis (SIDA) revealed elevated urinary concentrations of trigonelline and NMP for up to 48 (p=0.001) and 72 h (p=0.002), respectively, after coffee consumption when compared with non-coffee drinkers. CONCLUSION: Analysis of urinary NMP allows to check for coffee consumption within a period of 3 days and is proposed as a dietary biomarker which might be used as an analytical probe to control compliance in human intervention studies on coffee.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
New biomarkers for citrus fruit intake and coffee have been successfully identified using 24-hour dietary recalls and food-frequency questionnaires.
“Both 24-h dietary recalls and food-frequency questionnaires have been used, and new biomarkers for citrus fruit intake or coffee were successfully identified (49, 88) (Table 3).”
From The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure (2014) · cites this paper as [88]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Lang, R., Wahl, A., Stark, T., & Hofmann, T.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Hofmann, Thomas
- Venue
- Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05-25
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1613-1623
- ISSN
- 1613-4125 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4133
- OpenAlex
- W1984949403
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Nutrition & Food Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Potato Plant Research
- Keywords
- coffee consumption, dietary biomarkers, trigonelline, stable isotope dilution analysis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alkaloids, Calibration, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Coffee, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Pilot Projects, Pyridinium Compounds, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Molecular Structure, Biomarkers, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review