Cited by 54Muscle metabolism and nutritionNutrition and Health StudiesBiochemical effects in animals

Creatine and creatine forms intended for sports nutrition

Andres, Susanne, Ziegenhagen, Rainer, Trefflich, Iris, Pevny, Sophie, Schultrich, Katharina, Braun, Hans, Schänzer, Wilhelm, Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen Ildico +2 more·2017·Molecular Nutrition & Food Research

Abstract

Creatine is a popular ergogenic supplement in sports nutrition. Yet, supplementation of creatine occasionally caused adverse effects such as gastrointestinal complaints, muscle cramps and an increase in body weight. Creatine monohydrate has already been evaluated by different competent authorities and several have come to the conclusion that a daily intake of 3 g creatine per person is unlikely to pose safety concerns, focusing on healthy adults with exclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding women. Possible vulnerable subgroups were also discussed in relation to the safety of creatine. The present review provides an up‐to‐date overview of the relevant information with special focus on human studies regarding the safety of creatine monohydrate and other marketed creatine forms, in particular creatine pyruvate, creatine citrate, creatine malate, creatine taurinate, creatine phosphate, creatine orotate, creatine ethyl ester, creatine pyroglutamate, creatine gluconate, and magnesium creatine chelate. Limited data are available with regard to the safety of the latter creatine forms. Considering an acceptable creatine intake of 3 g per day, most of the evaluated creatine forms are unlikely to pose safety concerns, however some safety concerns regarding a supplementary intake of creatine orotate, creatine phosphate, and magnesium creatine chelate are discussed here.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mnfr.201600772

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andres, S., Ziegenhagen, R., Trefflich, I., Pevny, S., Schultrich, K., Braun, H., Schänzer, W., Hirsch‐Ernst, K. I., Schäfer, B., & Lampen, A.
Affiliations
  • German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) (DE)
  • German Sport University Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Andres, Susanne
Venue
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-30
Volume
61
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1613-4125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-4133
OpenAlex
W2562038883
Cited by
54
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Nutrition & Food Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Institute of Sport
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biochemical effects in animals
Keywords
creatine, creatine monohydrate, ergogenic aids, sports nutrition, supplement safety, phosphocreatine, adverse effects, vulnerable subgroups
MeSH terms
Animals, Consumer Product Safety, Creatine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Mitochondria, Phosphorylation, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements, Models, Animal, Muscle Cells, Performance-Enhancing Substances, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review