MR and CT data with multiobserver delineations of organs in the pelvic area—Part of the Gold Atlas project
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: We describe a public dataset with MR and CT images of patients performed in the same position with both multiobserver and expert consensus delineations of relevant organs in the male pelvic region. The purpose was to provide means for training and validation of segmentation algorithms and methods to convert MR to CT like data, i.e., so called synthetic CT (sCT). Acquisition and validation methods: T1‐ and T2‐weighted MR images as well as CT data were collected for 19 patients at three different departments. Five experts delineated nine organs for each patient based on the T2‐weighted MR images. An automatic method was used to fuse the delineations. Starting from each fused delineation, a consensus delineation was agreed upon by the five experts for each organ and patient. Segmentation overlap between user delineations with respect to the consensus delineations was measured to describe the spread of the collected data. Finally, an open‐source software was used to create deformation vector fields describing the relation between MR and CT images to further increase the usability of the dataset. Data format and usage notes: The dataset has been made publically available to be used for academic purposes, and can be accessed from https://zenodo.org/record/583096. Potential applications: The dataset provides a useful source for training and validation of segmentation algorithms as well as methods to convert MR to CT‐like data (sCT). To give some examples: The T2‐weighted MR images with their consensus delineations can directly be used as a template in an existing atlas‐based segmentation engine; the expert delineations are useful to validate the performance of a segmentation algorithm as they provide a way to measure variability among users which can be compared with the result of an automatic segmentation; and the pairwise deformably registered MR and CT images can be a source for an atlas‐based sCT algorithm or for validation of sCT algorithm.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All tasks in the study provide independent rater annotations, enabling ambiguity analysis.
“All tasks provide independent rater annotations, enabling ambiguity analysis.”
From Lost in the Folds: When Cross-Validation Is Not a Deep Ensemble for Uncertainty Estimation (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for mri: The promise12 challenge
Litjens, G., Toth, R., van de Ven, W., Hoeks, C., Kerkstra, S., van Ginneken, B., Vincent, G., Guillard, G., Birbeck, N., Zhang, J., et al. (2014) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2013.12.002 · Cited by 857 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Rasch CRN, Steenbakkers RJHM, Fitton I, et al. Decreased 3D observer variation with matched CT-MRI, for target delineation in Nasopharynx cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2010;5:21.
- Dirix P, Haustermans K, Vandecaveye V. The value of magnetic reso- nance imaging for radiotherapy planning. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014;24:151-159.
- Lee YK, Bollet M, Charles-edwards G, et al. Radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging alone. Radiother Oncol. 2003;66:203-216.
- Nyholm T, Jonsson J. Counterpoint: opportunities and challenges of a magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy work flow. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014;24:175-180.
- Sepp€ al€ a T, Visap€ a€ a H, Collan J, et al. Converting from CT-to MRI- only-based target definition in radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Strahlentherapie und Onkol. 2015;191:862-868.
- Siversson C, Nordstr€ om F, Nilsson T, et al. Technical Note: MRI only prostate radiotherapy planning using the statistical decomposition algo- rithm. Med Phys. 2015;42:6090-6097.
- Dowling JA, Sun J, Pichler P, et al. Automatic substitute computed tomography generation and contouring for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) -alone external beam radiation therapy from standard MRI sequences. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93:1144-1153.
- Lagendijk JJW, Raaymakers BW, Raaijmakers AJE, et al. MRI/linac integration. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:25-29.
- Keall PJ, Barton M, Crozier S. The australian magnetic resonance imag- ing-linac program. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014;24:203-206.
- Fallone BG. The rotating biplanar linac-magnetic resonance imaging system. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014;24:200-202.
- Mutic S, Dempsey JF. The viewray system: magnetic resonance-guided and controlled radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014;24:196-199.
- Wardman K, Prestwich RJD, Gooding MJ, Speight RJ. The feasibility of atlas-based automatic segmentation of MRI for H \& N radiotherapy planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17:146-154.
- Edmund JM, Nyholm T. A review of substitute CT generation for MRI- only radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2017;12:28.
- Warfield SK, Zou KH, Wells WM. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image seg- mentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004;23:903-921.
- Yoo TS, Ackerman MJ, Lorensen WE, et al. Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing API: a technical report on ITK -the insight toolkit. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:586-592.
- Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim J. elastix: a tool- box for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29:196-205.
- Taha AA, Hanbury A. Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmen- tation: analysis, selection, and tool. BMC Med Imaging. 2015;15:29.
- Nyholm T, Jonsson J, S€ oderstr€ om K, et al. Variability in prostate and seminal vesicle delineations defined on magnetic resonance images, a multi-observer, -center and -sequence study. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:126. Medical Physics, 45 (3), March 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy
Li, G., Wu, X., & Ma, X. (2022) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.08.005 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Lost in the Folds: When Cross-Validation Is Not a Deep Ensemble for Uncertainty Estimation
Kirscher, T., Bujotzek, M., Kirchhoff, Y., Rokuss, M., Isensee, F., Kahl, K.-C., Kovacs, B., & Maier-Hein, K. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.18329
- Authors
- Nyholm, T., Svensson, S., Andersson, S., Jonsson, J., Sohlin, M., Gustafsson, C., Kjellén, E., Söderström, K., Albertsson, P., Blomqvist, L., Zackrisson, B., Olsson, L. E., & Gunnlaugsson, A.
- Affiliations
- Umeå University (SE)
- RaySearch Laboratories (Sweden) (SE)
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- Lund University (SE)
- Skåne University Hospital (SE)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Nyholm, Tufve
- ORCID
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-24
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1295-1300
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2782686167
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Medical Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- VINNOVA
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- pelvic organs, synthetic CT, segmentation validation, deformation vector fields, deformable image registration, atlas-based segmentation, T2-weighted MRI, CT images
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pelvis, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review