Cited by 44Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Studying the relation between temporal reward discounting tasks used in populations with ADHD: a factor analysis

Open access
Scheres, Anouk, Sumiya, Motofumi, Thoeny, Allison Lee·2010·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed at investigating the relationship between tasks that have been used in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to measure choices between smaller immediate and larger delayed rewards: real and hypothetical temporal discounting tasks, and single-choice paradigms. METHODS: Participants were 55 undergraduate psychology students. Tasks included a real and hypothetical version of a temporal discounting (TD) task with choices between a large reward (10 cents) after delays up to 60 seconds, and smaller immediate rewards (2-8 cents); two versions of a hypothetical temporal discounting task with choices between a large reward ($100) after delays up to 120 months, and smaller immediate rewards ($1-$95); a Choice Delay Task with choices between one point now and two points after 30 seconds (one point is worth five cents). RESULTS: Correlation analyses showed that the real and the hypothetical TD tasks with 10 cents were very strongly associated. However, the hypothetical TD tasks with $100 did not correlate with either the real or the hypothetical TD task with 10 cents. Principal component analysis extracted two components: one for small amounts and short delays, and a second one for large rewards and long delays. CONCLUSIONS: Temporal reward discounting is not a uniform construct. Functional brain imaging research could shed more light on unique brain activation patterns associated with different forms of temporal reward discounting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mpr.309

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 44

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision, American Psychiatric Association.
  2. Barkley R.A., Edwards G., Laneri M., Fletcher K., Metevia L. (2001) Executive functioning, temporal discounting, and sense of time in adolescents with attention defi cit/hyper- activity disorder (AD/HD) and oppositional defi ant dis- order (ODD). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 541-546.
  3. Scheres A., Lee A., Sumiya M. (2008) Temporal reward dis- counting and ADHD: Task and symptom specifi c effects. Journal of Neural Transmission, 115, 221-226.

Authors
Scheres, A., Sumiya, M., & Thoeny, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-19
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
167-176
ISSN
  • 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0657
OpenAlex
W2123210545
Cited by
44
References
40
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r03mh074512-01a1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R03 MH074512, R03 MH074512-01A1, MH074512-01A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, delay discounting, delayed rewards, reward magnitude, impulsivity, construct validity, factor structure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Choice Behavior, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Factors, Community Health Planning, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review