Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Methyl TROSY: explanation and experimental verification

Ollerenshaw, Jason E., Tugarinov, Vitali, Kay, Lewis E.·2003·Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry

Abstract

In TROSY experiments, relaxation interference effects are exploited to produce spectra with improved resolution and signal‐to‐noise. Such experiments cannot be explained using the standard product operator formalism, but must instead be analyzed at the level of individual density matrix elements. Herein we illustrate this point using an example from our recent work on a TROSY 1 H–13 C correlation experiment for methyl groups in large proteins. Methyl groups are useful spectroscopic probes of protein structure and dynamics because they are found throughout the critical core region of a folded protein and their resonances are intense and well dispersed. Additionally, it is relatively easy to produce highly deuterated protein samples that are 1 H,13 C labeled at selected methyl positions, facilitating studies of high molecular weight systems. Methyl groups are relaxed by a network of 1 H–1 H and 1 H–13 C dipolar interactions, and in the macromolecular limit the destructive interference of these interactions leads to unusually slow relaxation for certain density matrix elements. It is this slow relaxation that forms the basis for TROSY experiments. We present a detailed analysis of evolution and relaxation during HSQC and HMQC pulse schemes for the case of a 13 C 1 H 3 spin system attached to a macromolecule. We show that the HMQC sequence is already optimal with respect to the TROSY effect, offering a significant sensitivity enhancement over HSQC at any spectrometer field strength. The gain in sensitivity is established experimentally using samples of two large proteins, malate synthase G (81.4 kDa) and ClpP protease (305 kDa), both highly deuterated and selectively 1 H,13 C‐labeled at isoleucine δ methyl positions. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrc.1256

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Ollerenshaw, J. E., Tugarinov, V., & Kay, L. E.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09-09
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
843-852
ISSN
  • 0749-1581 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-458X
OpenAlex
W2017312554
Cited by
208
References
0
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methyl TROSY: explanation and experimental verification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrc.1256
The paper
Ollerenshaw, J. E., Tugarinov, V., & Kay, L. E. (2003). Methyl TROSY: explanation and experimental verification. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.1256

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.