The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methyl TROSY: explanation and experimental verification
Abstract
In TROSY experiments, relaxation interference effects are exploited to produce spectra with improved resolution and signal‐to‐noise. Such experiments cannot be explained using the standard product operator formalism, but must instead be analyzed at the level of individual density matrix elements. Herein we illustrate this point using an example from our recent work on a TROSY 1 H–13 C correlation experiment for methyl groups in large proteins. Methyl groups are useful spectroscopic probes of protein structure and dynamics because they are found throughout the critical core region of a folded protein and their resonances are intense and well dispersed. Additionally, it is relatively easy to produce highly deuterated protein samples that are 1 H,13 C labeled at selected methyl positions, facilitating studies of high molecular weight systems. Methyl groups are relaxed by a network of 1 H–1 H and 1 H–13 C dipolar interactions, and in the macromolecular limit the destructive interference of these interactions leads to unusually slow relaxation for certain density matrix elements. It is this slow relaxation that forms the basis for TROSY experiments. We present a detailed analysis of evolution and relaxation during HSQC and HMQC pulse schemes for the case of a 13 C 1 H 3 spin system attached to a macromolecule. We show that the HMQC sequence is already optimal with respect to the TROSY effect, offering a significant sensitivity enhancement over HSQC at any spectrometer field strength. The gain in sensitivity is established experimentally using samples of two large proteins, malate synthase G (81.4 kDa) and ClpP protease (305 kDa), both highly deuterated and selectively 1 H,13 C‐labeled at isoleucine δ methyl positions. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Igumenova, T. I., Frederick, K. K., & Wand, A. J. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040422h · Cited by 314
Automatic structure-based NMR methyl resonance assignment in large proteins
Pritišanac, I., Würz, J. M., Alderson, T. R., & Güntert, P. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12837-8 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Ollerenshaw, J. E., Tugarinov, V., & Kay, L. E.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 843-852
- ISSN
- 0749-1581 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-458X
- OpenAlex
- W2017312554
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methyl TROSY: explanation and experimental verification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrc.1256
- The paper
- Ollerenshaw, J. E., Tugarinov, V., & Kay, L. E. (2003). Methyl TROSY: explanation and experimental verification. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.1256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.