The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tracer arrival timing‐insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion‐weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block‐circulant deconvolution matrix
Abstract
Relative cerebral blood flow (CBF) and tissue mean transit time (MTT) estimates from bolus‐tracking MR perfusion‐weighted imaging (PWI) have been shown to be sensitive to delay and dispersion when using singular value decomposition (SVD) with a single measured arterial input function. This study proposes a technique that is made time‐shift insensitive by the use of a block‐circulant matrix for deconvolution with (oSVD) and without (cSVD) minimization of oscillation of the derived residue function. The performances of these methods are compared with standard SVD (sSVD) in both numerical simulations and in clinically acquired data. An additional index of disturbed hemodynamics (oDelay) is proposed that represents the tracer arrival time difference between the AIF and tissue signal. Results show that PWI estimates from sSVD are weighted by tracer arrival time differences, while those from oSVD and cSVD are not. oSVD also provides estimates that are less sensitive to blood volume compared to cSVD. Using PWI data that can be routinely collected clinically, oSVD shows promise in providing tracer arrival timing‐insensitive flow estimates and hence a more specific indicator of ischemic injury. Shift maps can continue to provide a sensitive reflection of disturbed hemodynamics. Magn Reson Med 50:164–174, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Montagne, A., Nikolakopoulou, A. M., Huuskonen, M. T., Sagare, A. P., Lawson, E. J., Lazic, D., Rege, S. V., Grond, A., Zuniga, E., Barnes, S. R., et al. (2021) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-021-00073-z · Cited by 188
Reliable Estimation of Capillary Transit Time Distributions Using DSC-MRI
Mouridsen, K., Hansen, M. B., Østergaard, L., & Jespersen, S. N. (2014) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.111 · Cited by 133
Self-citationLuckhaus, C., Flüß, M. O., Wittsack, H.-J., Grass-Kapanke, B., Jänner, M., Khalili-Amiri, R., Friedrich, W., Supprian, T., Gaebel, W., Mödder, U., et al. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.053 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, O., Østergaard, L., Weisskoff, R. M., Benner, T., Rosen, B. R., & Sorensen, A. G.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06-13
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 164-174
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2018577646
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tracer arrival timing‐insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion‐weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block‐circulant deconvolution matrix. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.10522
- The paper
- Wu, O., Østergaard, L., Weisskoff, R. M., Benner, T., Rosen, B. R., & Sorensen, A. G. (2003). Tracer arrival timing‐insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion‐weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block‐circulant deconvolution matrix. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10522
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.