The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sizing it up: Cellular MRI using micron‐sized iron oxide particles
Open accessAbstract
There is rapidly increasing interest in the use of MRI to track cell migration in intact animals. Currently, cell labeling is usually accomplished by endocytosis of nanometer‐sized, dextran‐coated iron oxide particles. The limitations of using nanometer‐sized particles, however, are that millions of particles are required to achieve sufficient contrast, the label can be diluted beyond observability by cell division, and the label is biodegradable. These problems make it difficult to label cells other than macrophages in vivo, and to conduct long‐term engraftment studies. It was recently demonstrated that micron‐sized iron oxide particles (MPIOs) can be taken up by a number of cell types. In this study we examined the MRI properties of single MPIOs with sizes of 0.96, 1.63, 2.79, 4.50, and 5.80 μm. Furthermore, the capacity of cells to endocytose these MPIOs was investigated, and the MRI properties of the labeled cells at 7.0 and 11.7 Tesla were measured as a function of image resolution and echo time (TE). Cells labeled with MPIOs generally contained iron levels of ∼100 pg, which is approximately threefold higher than those obtained with the best strategies to label cells using nanometer‐sized particles. On occasion, some cells had levels as high as ∼400 pg. We demonstrate that these large particles and the cells labeled with them can be detected by spin echo (SE)‐based imaging methods. These measurements indicate that MPIOs should be useful for improving cell tracking by MRI. Magn Reson Med 53:329–338, 2005. Published 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reddy, L. H., Arias, J. L., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300068p · Cited by 2,010
Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles
Colombo, M., Carregal-Romero, S., Casula, M. F., Gutiérrez, L., Morales, M. P., Böhm, I. B., Heverhagen, J. T., Prosperi, D., & Parak, W. J. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15337h · Cited by 1,315
Soenen, S. J., Rivera-Gil, P., Montenegro, J.-M., Parak, W. J., De Smedt, S. C., & Braeckmans, K. (2011) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2011.08.001 · Cited by 699
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapiro, E. M., Skrtic, S., & Koretsky, A. P.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01-27
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 329-338
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2079986395
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sizing it up: Cellular MRI using micron‐sized iron oxide particles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.20342
- The paper
- Shapiro, E. M., Skrtic, S., & Koretsky, A. P. (2005). Sizing it up: Cellular MRI using micron‐sized iron oxide particles. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20342
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.