The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection threshold of single SPIO‐labeled cells with FIESTA
Abstract
MRI of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)‐labeled cells has become a valuable tool for studying the in vivo trafficking of transplanted cells. Cellular detection with MRI is generally considered to be orders of magnitude less sensitive than other techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission‐computed tomography (SPECT), or optical fluorescence microscopy. However, an analytic description of the detection threshold for single SPIO‐labeled cells and the parameters that govern detection has not been adequately provided. In the present work, the detection threshold for single SPIO‐labeled cells and the effect of resolution and SNR were studied for a balanced steady‐state free precession (SSFP) sequence (3D‐FIESTA). Based on the results from both theoretical and experimental analyses, an expression that predicts the minimum detectable mass of SPIO (mc) required to detect a single cell against a uniform signal background was derived: mc = 5 v/(Kfsl · SNR), where v is the voxel volume, SNR is the image signal‐to‐noise ratio, and Kfsl is an empirical constant measured to be 6.2 ± 0.5 × 10−5 μl/pgFe. Using this expression, it was shown that the sensitivity of MRI is not very different from that of PET, requiring femtomole quantities of SPIO iron for detection under typical micro‐imaging conditions (100 μm isotropic resolution, SNR = 60). The results of this work will aid in the design of cellular imaging experiments by defining the lower limit of SPIO labeling required for single cell detection at any given resolution and SNR. Magn Reson Med 53:312–320, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, Y.-X. J., Hussain, S. M., & Krestin, G. P. (2001) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s003300100908 · Cited by 1,381
Scotland, P., Zhou, D., Benveniste, H., & Bennett, V. (1998) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.143.5.1305 · Cited by 185
Cited by
Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles
Colombo, M., Carregal-Romero, S., Casula, M. F., Gutiérrez, L., Morales, M. P., Böhm, I. B., Heverhagen, J. T., Prosperi, D., & Parak, W. J. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15337h · Cited by 1,315
Magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic islets transplanted into the liver in humans
Saudek, F., Jirák, D., Girman, P., Herynek, V., Dezortová, M., Kříž, J., Peregrin, J., Berková, Z., Zacharovová, K., & Hájek, M. (2010) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0b013e3181ffba5e · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Heyn, C., Bowen, C. V., Rutt, B. K., & Foster, P. J.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01-27
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 312-320
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2114064853
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection threshold of single SPIO‐labeled cells with FIESTA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.20356
- The paper
- Heyn, C., Bowen, C. V., Rutt, B. K., & Foster, P. J. (2005). Detection threshold of single SPIO‐labeled cells with FIESTA. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.