Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 669

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

k‐t FOCUSS: A general compressed sensing framework for high resolution dynamic MRI

Open access
Jung, Hong, Sung, Kyunghyun, Nayak, Krishna S., Kim, Eung Yeop, Ye, Jong Chul·2009·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

A model‐based dynamic MRI called k‐t BLAST/SENSE has drawn significant attention from the MR imaging community because of its improved spatio‐temporal resolution. Recently, we showed that the k‐t BLAST/SENSE corresponds to the special case of a new dynamic MRI algorithm called k‐t FOCUSS that is optimal from a compressed sensing perspective. The main contribution of this article is an extension of k‐t FOCUSS to a more general framework with prediction and residual encoding, where the prediction provides an initial estimate and the residual encoding takes care of the remaining residual signals. Two prediction methods, RIGR and motion estimation/compensation scheme, are proposed, which significantly sparsify the residual signals. Then, using a more sophisticated random sampling pattern and optimized temporal transform, the residual signal can be effectively estimated from a very small number of k‐t samples. Experimental results show that excellent reconstruction can be achieved even from severely limited k‐t samples without aliasing artifacts. Magn Reson Med 61:103–116, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.21757

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 669

Metadata

Authors
Jung, H., Sung, K., Nayak, K. S., Kim, E. Y., & Ye, J. C.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12-18
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
103-116
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2132122471
Cited by
669
References
1
FWCI
18.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.