The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
k‐t FOCUSS: A general compressed sensing framework for high resolution dynamic MRI
Open accessAbstract
A model‐based dynamic MRI called k‐t BLAST/SENSE has drawn significant attention from the MR imaging community because of its improved spatio‐temporal resolution. Recently, we showed that the k‐t BLAST/SENSE corresponds to the special case of a new dynamic MRI algorithm called k‐t FOCUSS that is optimal from a compressed sensing perspective. The main contribution of this article is an extension of k‐t FOCUSS to a more general framework with prediction and residual encoding, where the prediction provides an initial estimate and the residual encoding takes care of the remaining residual signals. Two prediction methods, RIGR and motion estimation/compensation scheme, are proposed, which significantly sparsify the residual signals. Then, using a more sophisticated random sampling pattern and optimized temporal transform, the residual signal can be effectively estimated from a very small number of k‐t samples. Experimental results show that excellent reconstruction can be achieved even from severely limited k‐t samples without aliasing artifacts. Magn Reson Med 61:103–116, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging
Lustig, M., Donoho, D., & Pauly, J. M. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 · Cited by 6,952
Cited by
Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging
Jin, K. H., McCann, M. T., Froustey, E., & Unser, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2713099 · Cited by 2,529
“The class is broad, encompassing at least denoising, deconvolution, and reconstruction of MRI, CT, and diffraction tomography images.”
BackgroundInfluentialFeng, L., Grimm, R., Block, K. T., Chandarana, H., Kim, S., Xu, J., Axel, L., Sodickson, D. K., & Otazo, R. (2014) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.24980 · Cited by 718
Otazo, R., Kim, D., Axel, L., & Sodickson, D. K. (2010) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22463 · Cited by 571
Modified-CS: Modifying Compressive Sensing for Problems With Partially Known Support
Vaswani, N., & Lu, W. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2051150 · Cited by 517
Knoll, F., Hammernik, K., Zhang, C., Moeller, S., Pock, T., Sodickson, D. K., & Akcakaya, M. (2020) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2019.2950640 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, H., Sung, K., Nayak, K. S., Kim, E. Y., & Ye, J. C.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-18
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-116
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2132122471
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.