The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring RF‐induced currents inside implants: Impact of device configuration on MRI safety of cardiac pacemaker leads
Open accessAbstract
Radiofrequency (RF)‐related heating of cardiac pacemaker leads is a serious concern in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Recent investigations suggest such heating to be strongly dependent on an implant's position within the surrounding medium, but this issue is currently poorly understood. In this study, phantom measurements of the RF‐induced electric currents inside a pacemaker lead were performed to investigate the impact of the device position and lead configuration on the amount of MRI‐related heating at the lead tip. Seven hundred twenty device position/lead path configurations were investigated. The results show that certain configurations are associated with a highly increased risk to develop MRI‐induced heating, whereas various configurations do not show any significant heating. It was possible to precisely infer implant heating on the basis of current intensity values measured inside a pacemaker lead. Device position and lead configuration relative to the surrounding medium are crucial to the amount of RF‐induced heating in MRI. This indicates that a considerable number of implanted devices may incidentally not develop severe heating in MRI because of their specific configuration in the body. Small variations in configuration can, however, strongly increase the risk for such heating effects, meaning that hazardous situations might appear during MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Indik, J. H., Gimbel, J. R., Abe, H., Alkmim-Teixeira, R., Birgersdotter-Green, U., Clarke, G. D., Dickfeld, T.-M. L., Froelich, J. W., Grant, J., Hayes, D. L., et al. (2017) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.04.025 · Cited by 438
On the model validation of active implantable medical device for MRI safety assessment
Wang, Z., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Kainz, W., & Chen, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2019.2957766 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Nordbeck, P., Weiss, I., Ehses, P., Ritter, O., Warmuth, M., Fidler, F., Herold, V., Jakob, P. M., Ladd, M. E., Quick, H. H., & Bauer, W. R.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01-08
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 570-578
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2136554337
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring RF‐induced currents inside implants: Impact of device configuration on MRI safety of cardiac pacemaker leads. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.21881
- The paper
- Nordbeck, P., Weiss, I., Ehses, P., Ritter, O., Warmuth, M., Fidler, F., Herold, V., Jakob, P. M., Ladd, M. E., Quick, H. H., & Bauer, W. R. (2009). Measuring RF‐induced currents inside implants: Impact of device configuration on MRI safety of cardiac pacemaker leads. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21881
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.