Cited by 90Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

Three-dimensional diffusion tensor microimaging for anatomical characterization of the mouse brain

Open access
Aggarwal, Manisha, Mori, Susumu, Shimogori, Tomomi, Blackshaw, Seth, Zhang, Jiangyang·2010·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging is gaining increasing importance for anatomical imaging of the developing mouse brain. However, the application of diffusion tensor imaging to mouse brain imaging at microscopic levels is hindered by the limitation on achievable spatial resolution. In this study, fast diffusion tensor microimaging of the mouse brain, based on a diffusion‐weighted gradient and spin echo technique with twin‐navigator echo phase correction, is presented. Compared to echo planar and spin echo acquisition, the diffusion‐weighted gradient and spin echo acquisition resulted in significant reduction in scan time and had minimal image distortion, thereby allowing acquisition at higher spatial resolution. In this study, three‐dimensional diffusion tensor microimaging of the mouse brains at spatial resolutions of 50‐60 μm revealed unprecedented anatomical details. Thin fiber bundles in the adult striatum and white matter tracts in the embryonic day 12 mouse brains were visualized for the first time. The study demonstrated that data acquired using the diffusion tensor microimaging technique allow three‐dimensional mapping of gene expression data and can serve as a platform to study gene expression patterns in the context of neuroanatomy in the developing mouse brain. Magn Reson Med 64:249–261, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.22426

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We used an ultra high field 11.7 T scanner with a 3D DW-GRASE sequence that minimized distortion while allowing for a 12-fold acceleration compared to spin echo imaging.

    “we used an ultra high field 11.7 T scanner with a 3D DW-GRASE sequence that minimized distortion while allowing for a 12-fold acceleration compared to spin echo imaging (Aggarwal et al., 2010).”

    From The role of myelination in measures of white matter integrity: Combination of diffusion tensor imaging and two-photon microscopy of CLARITY intact brains (2017) · cites this paper as Aggarwal et al., 2010

    Materials and Methods (DTI acquisition and Pulse sequence details; page unavailable) describe an 11.7 T instrument and a 3D DW-GRASE sequence. The Results (Comparison of GRASE and spin echo DTI; page unavailable) report no discernible geometric distortion relative to multiple spin echo imaging, but a threefold—not 12-fold—reduction in scan time. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. [1]Sunkin SM Towards the integration of spatially and temporally resolved murine gene expression databases Trends in Genetics 2006 22 4 211 217 16499990
  2. [2]Paxinos G Halliday GH Watson C Koutcherov Y Wang H Atlas of the Developing Mouse Brain at E17.5, P0 and P6 2006 Academic Press
  3. [4]Venkataraman S Stevenson P Yang Y Richardson L Burton N Perry TP Smith P Baldock RA Davidson DR Christiansen JH EMAGE--Edinburgh Mouse Atlas of Gene Expression: 2008 update Nucleic Acids Res 2008 36 Database issue D860 D865 18077470 PMC2238921
  4. [5]Sharpe J Ahlgren U Perry P Hill B Ross A Hecksher-Sorensen J Baldock R Davidson D Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies Science 2002 296 5567 541 545 11964482
  5. [6]Jacobs RE Ahrens ET Dickinson ME Laidlaw D Towards a microMRI atlas of mouse development Comput Med Imaging Graph 1999 23 1 15 24 10091864
  6. [7]Benveniste H Kim K Zhang L Johnson GA Magnetic resonance microscopy of the C57BL mouse brain Neuroimage 2000 11 6 Pt 1 601 611 10860789
  7. [8]Basser PJ Mattiello J LeBihan D MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging Biophys J 1994 66 1 259 267 8130344 PMC1275686
  8. [9]Basser PJ Pierpaoli C A simplified method to measure the diffusion tensor from seven MR images Magn Reson Med 1998 39 6 928 934 9621916
  9. [10]Mori S Zhang J Principles of diffusion tensor imaging and its applications to basic neuroscience research Neuron 2006 51 5 527 539 16950152
  10. [11]Ng L Pathak SD Kuan C Lau C Dong H Sodt A Dang C Avants B Yushkevich P Gee JC Haynor D Lein E Jones A Hawrylycz M Neuroinformatics for genome-wide 3D gene expression mapping in the mouse brain IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2007 4 3 382 393 17666758
  11. [12]MacKenzie-Graham A Jones ES Shattuck DW Dinov ID Bota M Toga AW The informatics of a C57BL/6J mouse brain atlas Neuroinformatics 2003 1 4 397 410 15043223
  12. [13]MacKenzie-Graham A Lee EF Dinov ID Bota M Shattuck DW Ruffins S Yuan H Konstantinidis F Pitiot A Ding Y Hu G Jacobs RE Toga AW A multimodal, multidimensional atlas of the C57BL/6J mouse brain J Anat 2004 204 2 93 102 15032916 PMC1571243
  13. [14]Zhang J Richards LJ Yarowsky P Huang H van Zijl PC Mori S Three-dimensional anatomical characterization of the developing mouse brain by diffusion tensor microimaging Neuroimage 2003 20 3 1639 1648 14642474
  14. [15]Aggarwal M Zhang J Miller MI Sidman RL Mori S Magnetic resonance imaging and micro-computed tomography combined atlas of developing and adult mouse brains for stereotaxic surgery Neuroscience 2009 162 4 1339 1350 19490934 PMC2723180
  15. [16]Zhang J Miller MI Plachez C Richards LJ Yarowsky P van Zijl P Mori S Mapping postnatal mouse brain development with diffusion tensor microimaging Neuroimage 2005 26 4 1042 1051 15961044
  16. [17]Song SK Yoshino J Le TQ Lin SJ Sun SW Cross AH Armstrong RC Demyelination increases radial diffusivity in corpus callosum of mouse brain Neuroimage 2005 26 1 132 140 15862213
  17. [18]Tyszka JM Readhead C Bearer EL Pautler RG Jacobs RE Statistical diffusion tensor histology reveals regional dysmyelination effects in the shiverer mouse mutant Neuroimage 2006 29 4 1058 1065 16213163 PMC3376084
  18. [19]Zhang J van Zijl PC Mori S Three dimensional diffusion tensor magnetic resonance micro-imaging of adult mouse brain and hippocampus NeuroImage 2002 15 892 901 11906229
  19. [20]Wang Y Zhang J Mori S Nathans J Axonal growth and guidance defects in Frizzled3 knock-out mice: a comparison of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging, neurofilament staining, and genetically directed cell labeling J Neurosci 2006 26 2 355 364 16407530 PMC6674392
  20. [21]Schambra U Lauder JM Silver J Atlas of the Prenatal Mouse Brain 1991 Academic Press 1748192
  21. [22]Bulfone A Puelles L Porteus MH Frohman MA Martin GR Rubenstein JL Spatially restricted expression of Dlx-1, Dlx-2 (Tes-1), Gbx-2, and Wnt-3 in the embryonic day 12.5 mouse forebrain defines potential transverse and longitudinal segmental boundaries J Neurosci 1993 13 7 3155 3172 7687285 PMC6576688
  22. [23]Vue TY Aaker J Taniguchi A Kazemzadeh C Skidmore JM Martin DM Martin JF Treier M Nakagawa Y Characterization of progenitor domains in the developing mouse thalamus J Comp Neurol 2007 505 1 73 91 17729296
  23. [24]Hoekman MF Jacobs FM Smidt MP Burbach JP Spatial and temporal expression of FoxO transcription factors in the developing and adult murine brain Gene Expr Patterns 2006 6 2 134 140 16326148
  24. [25]Mori S van Zijl PCM A motion correction scheme by twin-echo navigation for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with multiple RF echo acquisition Magn Reson Med 1998 40 511 516 9771567
  25. [26]Oshio K Feinberg D GRASE (gradient- and spin-echo) imaging: a novel fast MRI technique Magn Reson Med 1991 20 344 349 1775061
  26. [27]D'Arceuil HE Westmoreland S de Crespigny AJ An approach to high resolution diffusion tensor imaging in the fixed primate brain NeuroImage 2006 35 2 553 565 17292630
  27. [28]Oshio K vGRASE: separating phase and T2 modulations in 2D Magn Reson Med 2000 44 383 386 10975889
  28. [29]Mugler JP Improved three-dimensional GRASE imaging with the SORT phase-encoding strategy Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1999 9 604 612 10232521
  29. [30]Reese TG Heid O Weistoff RM Wedeen VJ Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo Magn Reson Med 2003 49 177 182 12509835
  30. [31]Jones DK The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: A Monte Carlo study Magn Reson Med 2004 51 807 815 15065255
  31. [32]Jiang H van Zijl PCM Kim J Pearlson GD Mori S DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2006 81 2 106 116 16413083
  32. [33]Mori S Crain BJ Chacko VP van Zijl PCM Three dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging Annals of Neurology 1999 45 265 269 9989633
  33. [34]Kataoka A Shimogori T Fgf8 controls regional identity in the developing thalamus Development 2008 135 2865 2871 18653561
  34. [35]Woods RP Grafton ST Watson JD Sicotte NL Mazziotta JC Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1998 22 1 153 165 9448780
  35. [36]Joshi SC Miller MI Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphisms IEEE Trans Image Process 2000 9 8 1357 1370 18262973
  36. [37]van Dusschoten D Moonen CT de Jager PA Van As H Unraveling diffusion constants in biological tissue by combining Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill imaging and pulse field gradient NMR Magn Reson Med 1996 36 907 913 8946356
  37. [38]Chahboune H Ment LR Stewart WB Ma X Rothman DL Hyder F Neurodevelopment of C57B/L6 mouse brain assessed by in vivo diffusion tensor imaging NMR Biomed 2007 20 3 375 382 17451176
  38. [39]Sun SW Neil JJ Liang HF He YY Schmidt RE Hsu CY Song SK Formalin fixation alters water diffusion coefficient magnitude but not anisotropy in infarcted brain Magn Reson Med 2005 53 6 1447 1451 15906292
  39. [40]Mori S van Zijl PC Fiber tracking: principles and strategies - a technical review NMR Biomed 2002 15 7–8 468 480 12489096
  40. [41]Tuch DS Reese TG Wiegell MR Wedeen VJ Diffusion MRI of complex neural architecture Neuron 2003 40 5 885 895 14659088
  41. [42]Frank LR Characterization of anisotropy in high angular resolution diffusion-weighted MRI Magn Reson Med 2002 47 6 1083 1099 12111955
  42. [43]Koch MA Norris DG Hund-Georgiadis M An investigation of functional and anatomical connectivity using magnetic resonance imaging Neuroimage 2002 16 1 241 250 11969331
  43. [44]Behrens TE Woolrich MW Jenkinson M Johansen-Berg H Nunes RG Clare S Matthews PM Brady JM Smith SM Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging Magn Reson Med 2003 50 5 1077 1088 14587019
  44. [45]Gruetter R Tkac I Field mapping without reference scan using asymmetric echo-planar techniques Magn Reson Med 2000 43 2 319 323 10680699
  45. [46]Pipe JG Farthing VG Forbes KP Multishot diffusion-weighted FSE using PROPELLER MRI Magn Reson Med 2002 47 42 52 11754441
  46. [47]Alsop DC Phase insensitive preparation of single-shot RARE: Application to diffusion imaging in humans Magn Reson Med 1997 38 527 533 9324317
  47. [48]Tyszka JM Frank LR High-field diffusion MR histology: Image-based correction of eddy-current ghosts in diffusion-weighted rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (DW-RARE) Magn Reson Med 2009 61 728 733 19097246 PMC4319701

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aggarwal, M., Mori, S., Shimogori, T., Blackshaw, S., & Zhang, J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
  • RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
Corresponding author
Aggarwal, Manisha
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-23
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
249-261
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2019925358
Cited by
90
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG020012, R01AG20012-01)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS070909, R21NS065306, R21NS059529)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB003543)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR15241-01, P41RR015241)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
mouse brain, spin echo, high spatial resolution, striatum, white matter tracts, embryonic brain development, gene expression mapping, neuroanatomy
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Chromosome Mapping, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Radiography, Homeodomain Proteins, Mice, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review