Cited by 105MRI in cancer diagnosisAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

The effect of low b-values on the intravoxel incoherent motion derived pseudodiffusion parameter in liver

Open access
Cohen, Alexander D., Schieke, Moira C., Hohenwalter, Mark D., Schmainda, Kathleen M.·2015·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the effect of low b‐values (0 < b < 50 s/mm 2) on the calculation of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) derived pseudodiffusion parameter in the normal liver. Methods: Simulations were performed to examine the effects of adding low b‐values on the pseudodiffusion parameter. Low b‐values were cumulatively added to the distribution and the IVIM signal was generated with varying pseudodiffusion values. The signal was fit with the IVIM model after the addition of Gaussian noise, and the simulated values were compared with the true values. In addition, the livers of eight control subjects were imaged using respiratory‐triggered DWI. Pseudodiffusion was calculated with and without low b‐values and compared. Results: Pseudodiffusion tended to be underestimated when low b‐values were not included in the b‐value distribution as predicted by simulations and confirmed with in vivo imaging. The number of outlier values was also reduced as more low b‐values were added. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study showed pseudodiffusion in the liver tended to be underestimated when too few low b‐values (0 < b < 50 s/mm 2) were included in the distribution. Therefore, it is recommended to include at least two low b‐values when performing liver IVIM studies. Magn Reson Med 73:306–311, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.25109

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In imaging practice, the ideal narrow-pulse Stejskal-Tanner equation is insufficient because imaging gradient pulses, crusher gradient pulses, and their cross-terms with diffusion-encoding gradients can contribute substantially to diffusion signal attenuation.

    “In imaging practice, however, the ideal narrow pulse Stejskal–Tanner equation is insufficient because imaging gradient pulses, crusher gradient pulses, and their cross-terms with the diffusion-encoding gradient pulses can contribute substantially to the diffusion signal attenuation (Cohen et al., 2015; Le Bihan & Breton, 1985; Rashid et al., 2025).”

    From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Cohen et al., 2015

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Accurate b-value calculation is critical, including imaging gradients and cross-terms with diffusion-encoding gradients, as these effects are far from negligible at low b-values.

    “Especially, accurate b-value calculation is critical, including imaging gradients and cross-terms with diffusion-encoding gradients, as these effects are far from negligible at low b-values (Cohen et al., 2015; Rashid et al., 2025).”

    From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Cohen et al., 2015

    The Methods and Discussion and Conclusions sections examine which low b-values are included when estimating liver pseudodiffusion, not how b-values are calculated. Searches for imaging gradients and cross-terms with diffusion-encoding gradients found no passage addressing whether those effects are appreciable at low b-values. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [1]Koh DM Collins DJ Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007 188 6 1622 1635 17515386
  2. [2]Wang QB Zhu H Liu HL Zhang B Performance of magnetic resonance elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging for the staging of hepatic fibrosis: A meta-analysis Hepatology 2012 56 1 239 247 22278368
  3. [3]Patel J Sigmund EE Rusinek H Oei M Babb JS Taouli B Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone and in combination: preliminary experience J Magn Reson Imaging 2010 31 3 589 600 20187201 PMC5207803
  4. [4]Luciani A Vignaud A Cavet M Nhieu JT Mallat A Ruel L Laurent A Deux JF Brugieres P Rahmouni A Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging--pilot study Radiology 2008 249 3 891 899 19011186
  5. [5]Chow AM Gao DS Fan SJ Qiao Z Lee FY Yang J Man K Wu EX Liver fibrosis: an intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) study J Magn Reson Imaging 36 1 159 167 22334528
  6. [6]Dyvorne HA Galea N Nevers T Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver with multiple b values: effect of diffusion gradient polarity and breathing acquisition on image quality and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters--a pilot study Radiology 2013 266 3 920 929 23220895 PMC3579172
  7. [7]Le Bihan D Turner R MacFall JR Effects of intravoxel incoherent motions (IVIM) in steady-state free precession (SSFP) imaging: application to molecular diffusion imaging Magn Reson Med 1989 10 3 324 337 2733589
  8. [8]Le Bihan D Breton E Lallemand D Aubin ML Vignaud J Laval-Jeantet M Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging Radiology 1988 168 2 497 505 3393671
  9. [9]Le Bihan D Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR imaging: a wake-up call Radiology 2008 249 3 748 752 19011179
  10. [10]Lemke A Laun FB Klauss M Re TJ Simon D Delorme S Schad LR Stieltjes B Differentiation of pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters Invest Radiol 2009 44 12 769 775 19838121
  11. [11]Ichikawa S Motosugi U Ichikawa T Sano K Morisaka H Araki T Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of the kidney: alterations in diffusion and perfusion in patients with renal dysfunction Magn Reson Imaging 2013 31 3 414 417 23102943
  12. [12]Wirestam R Borg M Brockstedt S Lindgren A Holtas S Stahlberg F Perfusion-related parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging compared with CBV and CBF measured by dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR technique Acta Radiol 2001 42 2 123 128 11281143
  13. [13]Federau C Maeder P O’Brien K Browaeys P Meuli R Hagmann P Quantitative measurement of brain perfusion with intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging Radiology 2012 265 3 874 881 23074258
  14. [14]Andreou A Orton M Collins DJ Leach MO Koh D-M Short term measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction (f), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) and diffusion coefficient (D) in colorectal liver metastases derived by intravoxel incoherent motion analysis of respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MR imaging ISMRM Montreal, Canada 2011 23052642
  15. [15]Yamada I Aung W Himeno Y Nakagawa T Shibuya H Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepatic lesions: evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging Radiology 1999 210 3 617 623 10207458
  16. [16]Andreou A Koh DM Collins DJ Blackledge M Wallace T Leach MO Orton MR Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases Eur Radiol 23 2 428 434 23052642
  17. [18]Lemke A Stieltjes B Schad LR Laun FB Toward an optimal distribution of b values for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging Magn Reson Imaging 2011 29 6 766 776 21549538
  18. [19]Choi JS Kim MJ Choi JY Park MS Lim JS Kim KW Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of liver on 3. 0-Tesla system: effect of intravenous administration of gadoxetic acid disodium Eur Radiol 2010 20 5 1052 1060 19915849
  19. [20]Naganawa S Sato C Nakamura T Kumada H Ishigaki T Miura S Maruyama K Takizawa O Diffusion-weighted images of the liver: comparison of tumor detection before and after contrast enhancement with superparamagnetic iron oxide J Magn Reson Imaging 2005 21 6 836 840 15906340
  20. [21]Taouli B Sandberg A Stemmer A Parikh T Wong S Xu J Lee VS Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: comparison of navigator triggered and breathhold acquisitions J Magn Reson Imaging 2009 30 3 561 568 19711402
  21. [22]Gudbjartsson H Patz S The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data Magn Reson Med 1995 34 6 910 914 8598820 PMC2254141
  22. [23]Orton MR Collins DJ Koh DM Leach MO Improved intravoxel incoherent motion analysis of diffusion weighted imaging by data driven Bayesian modeling Magn Reson Med 2013 10.1002/mrm.24649 23408505 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, A. D., Schieke, M. C., Hohenwalter, M. D., & Schmainda, K. M.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Schmainda, Kathleen M.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-29
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
306-311
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W1600280496
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
FWCI
10.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin (3R01 CA082500)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
intravoxel incoherent motion, liver, diffusion-weighted imaging, respiratory-triggered imaging
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Liver, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Motion, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review