Deep convolutional neural network for segmentation of knee joint anatomy
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To describe and evaluate a new segmentation method using deep convolutional neural network (CNN), 3D fully connected conditional random field (CRF), and 3D simplex deformable modeling to improve the efficiency and accuracy of knee joint tissue segmentation. Methods: A segmentation pipeline was built by combining a semantic segmentation CNN, 3D fully connected CRF, and 3D simplex deformable modeling. A convolutional encoder‐decoder network was designed as the core of the segmentation method to perform high resolution pixel‐wise multi‐class tissue classification for 12 different joint structures. The 3D fully connected CRF was applied to regularize contextual relationship among voxels within the same tissue class and between different classes. The 3D simplex deformable modeling refined the output from 3D CRF to preserve the overall shape and maintain a desirable smooth surface for joint structures. The method was evaluated on 3D fast spin‐echo (3D‐FSE) MR image data sets. Quantitative morphological metrics were used to evaluate the accuracy and robustness of the method in comparison to the ground truth data. Results: The proposed segmentation method provided good performance for segmenting all knee joint structures. There were 4 tissue types with high mean Dice coefficient above 0.9 including the femur, tibia, muscle, and other non‐specified tissues. There were 7 tissue types with mean Dice coefficient between 0.8 and 0.9 including the femoral cartilage, tibial cartilage, patella, patellar cartilage, meniscus, quadriceps and patellar tendon, and infrapatellar fat pad. There was 1 tissue type with mean Dice coefficient between 0.7 and 0.8 for joint effusion and Baker's cyst. Most musculoskeletal tissues had a mean value of average symmetric surface distance below 1 mm. Conclusion: The combined CNN, 3D fully connected CRF, and 3D deformable modeling approach was well‐suited for performing rapid and accurate comprehensive tissue segmentation of the knee joint. The deep learning‐based segmentation method has promising potential applications in musculoskeletal imaging.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The VGG16 network has proven to be an effective and efficient network of feature extraction in many medical image applications, including tissue segmentation and image contrast conversion.
“More recently, the VGG16 network has proven to be an effective and efficient network of feature extraction in many medical image applications, including tissue segmentation (14,24–26) and image contrast conversion (27,28).”
From Deep learning approach for evaluating knee MR images: achieving high diagnostic performance for cartilage lesion detection. (2018) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741 · see citing works
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408 · see citing works
Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation
Kamnitsas, K., Ledig, C., Newcombe, V. F. J., Simpson, J. P., Kane, A. D., Menon, D. K., Rueckert, D., & Glocker, B. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.10.004 · Cited by 3,498 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Despite this method might perform quite well in segmenting small number of classes in volumetric data (e.g., brain lesion segmentation), 58 the limited spatial context in each patch and relative shallow network structure prevent such method from accurately segmenting complex tissue structures with…”
MethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, F., Zhou, Z., Samsonov, A., Blankenbaker, D., Larison, W., Kanarek, A., Lian, K., Kambhampati, S., & Kijowski, R. (2018) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018172986 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Self-citationApplication of artificial intelligence in medical technologies: a systematic review of main trends.
Bitkina, O. V., Park, J., & Kim, H. K. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231189331 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Yu, K., Ying, J., Zhao, T., Lei, L., Zhong, L., Hu, J., Zhou, J. W., Huang, C., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-22-368 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhou, Z., Zhao, G., Kijowski, R., & Liu, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Fang
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-05-17
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2759-2770
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- PMC
- PMC6342268
- OpenAlex
- W2803328900
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 10.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR068373)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- knee joint segmentation, knee anatomy, deep convolutional neural networks, encoder-decoder architecture, fast spin-echo MRI, cartilage segmentation, meniscus, Baker's cyst, joint effusion, musculoskeletal imaging
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Aged, Bone and Bones, Cartilage, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Knee, Knee Joint, Male, Middle Aged, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, Imaging, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review