The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology literature review: Quantitative sensory testing
Abstract
The development of the personal computer has simplified the process of quantitating sensory thresholds using various testing algorithms. We reviewed the technical aspects and reproducibility of different methods to determine threshold for light touch‐pressure, vibration, thermal, and pain stimuli. Clinical uses and limitations of quantitative sensory testing (QST) were also reviewed. QST is a reliable psychophysical test of large‐ and small‐fiber sensory modalities. The results of QST are highly dependent on methodology and the full cooperation of the subject. QST has been shown to be reasonably reproducible over a period of days or weeks in normal subjects. The use of QST in research and patient care should be limited to instruments and their corresponding methodologies that have been shown to be reproducible. Literature data do not allow conclusions regarding the relative merits of individual QST instruments. Muscle Nerve 29: 734–747, 2004
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Normative values of vibratory perception in 530 children, juveniles and adults aged 3–79 years
Hilz, M. J., Axelrod, F. B., Hermann, K., Haertl, U., Duetsch, M., & Neundörfer, B. (1998) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0022-510x(98)00177-4 · Cited by 176
Cited by
Hansson, P., Backonja, M., & Bouhassira, D. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.03.030 · Cited by 377
Pain-autonomic interaction after work-induced sleep restriction
Schestatsky, P., Dall‐Agnol, L., Gheller, L., Stefani, L. C., Sanches, P. R. S., de Souza, I. C., Torres, I. L., & Caumo, W. (2013) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/ene.12011 · Cited by 23
Autologous ear reconstruction for microtia does not result in loss of cutaneous sensitivity.
Denadai, R., Raposo-Amaral, C. E., Zanco, G. L., & Raposo- Amaral, C. A. (2019) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000005485 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Chong, P. S. T., & Cros, D. P.
- Venue
- Muscle & Nerve
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 734-747
- ISSN
- 0148-639X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4598
- OpenAlex
- W1988741206
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology literature review: Quantitative sensory testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mus.20053
- The paper
- Chong, P. S. T., & Cros, D. P. (2004). Technology literature review: Quantitative sensory testing. Muscle & Nerve. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
