The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of exercise with and without different degrees of blood flow restriction on torque and muscle activation
Abstract
Introduction: An unresolved question in resistance training combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) is what percentage of estimated arterial occlusion pressure provides the most robust acute muscular response. Methods: Forty participants were assigned to Experiments 1, 2, or 3. Each experiment completed exercise protocols differing by pressure, exercise load, and/or volume. Torque was measured pre‐ and postexercise, and muscle activation was measured pre‐ and during each set. Results: Pressure and load did not affect torque greatly. Muscle activation increased in all conditions (P < 0.05) and was higher with 30% 1RM compared with 20% 1RM. Pressure appeared to increase muscle activation from 40% to 50% arterial occlusion [66% vs. 87% maximal voluntary contraction (30% 1RM)] but was not further increased with higher pressure. Conclusion: Different levels of BFR may alter the acute muscular response to a degree, although higher pressures do not appear to augment these changes. Muscle Nerve 51:713–721, 2015
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men
Mitchell, C. J., Churchward-Venne, T. A., West, D. W. D., Burd, N. A., Breen, L., Baker, S. K., & Phillips, S. M. (2012) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012 · Cited by 627
Van Roie, E., Delecluse, C., Coudyzer, W., Boonen, S., & Bautmans, I. (2013) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2013.08.010 · Cited by 178 · cited 3×
“20%/60 BFR 28 (11) 32 (13) 37 (14) 40 (16) 1 vs.”
Gundermann, D. M., Walker, D. K., Reidy, P. T., Borack, M. S., Dickinson, J. M., Volpi, E., & Rasmussen, B. B. (2014) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00600.2013 · Cited by 143
Cited by
Lixandrão, M. E., Ugrinowitsch, C., Berton, R., Vechin, F. C., Conceição, M. S., Damas, F., Libardi, C. A., & Roschel, H. (2018) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0795-y · Cited by 554
Training to Fatigue: The Answer for Standardization When Assessing Muscle Hypertrophy?
Dankel, S. J., Jessee, M. B., Mattocks, K. T., Mouser, J. G., Counts, B. R., Buckner, S. L., & Loenneke, J. P. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0633-7 · Cited by 115
Self-citationThe acute and chronic effects of “NO LOAD” resistance training
Counts, B. R., Buckner, S. L., Dankel, S. J., Jessee, M. B., Mattocks, K. T., Mouser, J. G., Laurentino, G. C., & Loenneke, J. P. (2016) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.06.024 · Cited by 77
Self-citationCornish, S. M., Bugera, E. M., Duhamel, T. A., Peeler, J. D., & Anderson, J. E. (2020) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-020-04337-1 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Loenneke, J. P., Kim, D., Fahs, C. A., Thiebaud, R. S., Abe, T., Larson, R. D., Bemben, D. A., & Bemben, M. G.
- Venue
- Muscle & Nerve
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-20
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 713-721
- ISSN
- 0148-639X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4598
- OpenAlex
- W1573704884
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of exercise with and without different degrees of blood flow restriction on torque and muscle activation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mus.24448
- The paper
- Loenneke, J. P., Kim, D., Fahs, C. A., Thiebaud, R. S., Abe, T., Larson, R. D., Bemben, D. A., & Bemben, M. G. (2015). Effects of exercise with and without different degrees of blood flow restriction on torque and muscle activation. Muscle & Nerve. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24448
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
