Recovery of strength is dependent on mTORC1 signaling after eccentric muscle injury: mTORC1 and Recovery of Strength
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Eccentric contractions may cause immediate and long-term reductions in muscle strength that can be recovered through increased protein synthesis rates. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the mechanistic target-of-rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), a vital controller of protein synthesis rates, is required for return of muscle strength after injury. METHODS: Isometric muscle strength was assessed before, immediately after, and then 3, 7, and 14 days after a single bout of 150 eccentric contractions in mice that received daily injections of saline or rapamycin. RESULTS: The bout of eccentric contractions increased the phosphorylation of mTORC1 (1.8-fold) and p70s6k1 (13.8-fold), mTORC1's downstream effector, 3 days post-injury. Rapamycin blocked mTORC1 and p70s6k1 phosphorylation and attenuated recovery of muscle strength (∼20%) at 7 and 14 days. CONCLUSION: mTORC1 signaling is instrumental in the return of muscle strength after a single bout of eccentric contractions in mice. Muscle Nerve 54: 914-924, 2016.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Skeletal muscle protein synthesis signaling, via activation of the mTORC1 pathway, is stimulated in the range of 1-7 days post-damage in response to various eccentric or lengthening contraction protocols in rodents and humans.
“Skeletal muscle protein synthesis signaling, via activation of the mTORC1 pathway, is stimulated in the range of 1–7 days post-damage in response to various eccentric or lengthening contraction protocols in rodents and humans (57–61).”
From Phytoecdysteroids Accelerate Recovery of Skeletal Muscle Function Following in vivo Eccentric Contraction-Induced Injury in Adult and Old Mice (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Baumann, C. W., Rogers, R. G., Otis, J. S., & Ingalls, C. P.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ingalls, Christopher Paul
- Venue
- Muscle & Nerve
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-08-22
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 914-924
- ISSN
- 0148-639X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2309187333
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Muscle & Nerve (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (AR-41802)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
- Keywords
- mTORC1 signaling, muscle strength recovery, rapamycin, protein synthesis, eccentric contraction, skeletal muscle
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Electric Stimulation, Female, Immunosuppressive Agents, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Muscle Contraction, Muscular Diseases, Time Factors, Signal Transduction, Muscle, Skeletal, Torque, Sirolimus, Recovery of Function, Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDa, Mice, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review