Cited by 16Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes

Clinical and neurophysiological biomarkers of disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Hannaford, Andrew, Byth, Karen, Pavey, Nathan, Henderson, Robert D., Mathers, Susan, Needham, Merrilee, Schultz, David, Menon, Parvathi +2 more·2023·Muscle & Nerve

Abstract

Introduction/Aims: Rate of disease progression (ΔFS), measured as change in the revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS‐R) and body mass index (BMI), are predictors of survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Our aim in this study was to assess the utility of these clinical biomarkers along with neurophysiological measures, such as the split hand index (SI), in monitoring disease progression. Methods: Clinical trial data were collected from 107 patients recruited into the Tecfidera in ALS trial. The prognostic utility of clinical and neurophysiological measures, including ΔFS, BMI, SI, and neurophysiological index (NPI), were assessed cross‐sectionally and longitudinally (40 weeks). The outcome measures of disease severity and progression included: (i) ALSFRS‐R score; (ii) Medical Research Council (MRC) score; and (iii) forced vital capacity and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure. Results: Fast‐progressor ALS patients (ΔFS ≥1.1) exhibited significantly lower ALSFRS‐R and total MRC scores at baseline. A baseline ΔFS score ≥1.1 was associated with a greater reduction in ALSFRS‐R (P = .002) and MRC (P = .002) scores over 40 weeks. Baseline BMI <25 was also associated with faster reduction of ALSFRS‐R and MRC scores. SI and NPI were associated with disease severity at baseline, but not with subsequent rate of disease progression. Discussion: Implementation of the assessed clinical and neurophysiological biomarkers may assist in patient management and stratification into clinical trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mus.27736

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hannaford, A., Byth, K., Pavey, N., Henderson, R. D., Mathers, S., Needham, M., Schultz, D., Menon, P., Kiernan, M. C., & Vucic, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU)
  • Calvary Health Care Bethlehem (AU)
  • Murdoch University (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Vucic, Steve
Venue
Muscle & Nerve
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-10-25
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
17-24
ISSN
  • 0148-639X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4598
OpenAlex
W4303985933
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Muscle & Nerve (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • FightMND
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, disease progression, clinical biomarkers, neurophysiological markers, ALSFRS-R, body mass index, Tecfidera, disease severity, prognostic factors, patient stratification
MeSH terms
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Humans, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review