Cited by 96Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Histological correlation of diffusional kurtosis and white matter modeling metrics in cuprizone‐induced corpus callosum demyelination

Open access
Falangola, Maria F., Guilfoyle, David N., Tabesh, Ali, Hui, Edward S., Nie, Xingju, Jensen, Jens H., Gerum, Scott V., Hu, Caixia +3 more·2014·NMR in Biomedicine

Abstract

The cuprizone mouse model is well established for studying the processes of both demyelination and remyelination in the corpus callosum, and it has been utilized together with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to investigate myelin and axonal pathology. Although some underlying morphological mechanisms contributing to the changes in diffusion tensor (DT) metrics have been identified, the understanding of specific associations between histology and diffusion measures remains limited. Diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) is an extension of DTI that provides metrics of diffusional non-Gaussianity, for which an associated white matter modeling (WMM) method has been developed. The main goal of the present study was to quantitatively assess the relationships between diffusion measures and histological measures in the mouse model of cuprizone-induced corpus callosum demyelination. The diffusional kurtosis (DK) and WMM metrics were found to provide additional information that enhances the sensitivity to detect the morphological heterogeneity in the chronic phase of the disease process in the rostral segment of the corpus callosum. Specifically, in the rostral segment, axonal water fraction (d = 2.6; p < 0.0001), radial kurtosis (d = 2.0; p = 0.001) and mean kurtosis (d = 1.5; p = 0.005) showed the most sensitivity between groups with respect to yielding statistically significant p values and high Cohen's d values. These results demonstrate the ability of DK and WMM metrics to detect white mater changes and inflammatory processes associated with cuprizone-induced demyelination. They also validate, in part, the application of these new WMM metrics for studying neurological diseases, as well as helping to elucidate their biophysical meaning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nbm.3140

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpreting MRI alterations in AD remains challenging because MRI contrasts reflect complex, combined contributions from cellular composition, microstructural organization, and biochemical changes rather than disease-specific processes alone, and provide only indirect measurements of underlying physiological mechanisms.

    “Interpreting MRI alterations in AD remains challenging because MRI contrasts reflect complex, combined contributions from cellular composition, microstructural organization, and biochemical changes rather than disease‐specific processes alone, 26 , 79 , 80 and provide only indirect measurements of underlying physiological mechanisms. 81”

    From Diffusion MRI reveals amyloid plaque–associated cellular signatures through spatial transcriptomic integration (2026) · cites this paper as [80]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 96

Authors
Falangola, M. F., Guilfoyle, D. N., Tabesh, A., Hui, E. S., Nie, X., Jensen, J. H., Gerum, S. V., Hu, C., LaFrancois, J., Collins, H. R., & Helpern, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Falangola, Maria F.
Venue
NMR in Biomedicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-03
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
948-957
ISSN
  • 0952-3480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1492
OpenAlex
W2149600133
Cited by
96
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NMR in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (5R03EB009711-2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cuprizone, corpus callosum demyelination, remyelination, diffusion kurtosis imaging, histopathological correlation, radial kurtosis, mean kurtosis, neuroinflammation, mouse model
MeSH terms
Animals, Corpus Callosum, Cuprizone, Demyelinating Diseases, Diffusion, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Statistics, Nonparametric, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review