Inflammation‐driven glial alterations in the cuprizone mouse model probed with diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 11.7 T
Open accessAbstract
Inflammation of brain tissue is a complex response of the immune system to the presence of toxic compounds or to cell injury, leading to a cascade of pathological processes that include glial cell activation. Noninvasive MRI markers of glial reactivity would be very useful for in vivo detection and monitoring of inflammation processes in the brain, as well as for evaluating the efficacy of personalized treatments. Due to their specific location in glial cells, myo ‐inositol (mIns) and choline compounds (tCho) seem to be the best candidates for probing glial‐specific intra‐cellular compartments. However, their concentrations quantified using conventional proton MRS are not specific for inflammation. In contrast, it has been recently suggested that mIns intra‐cellular diffusion, measured using diffusion‐weighted MRS (DW‐MRS) in a mouse model of reactive astrocytes, could be a specific marker of astrocytic hypertrophy. In order to evaluate the specificity of both mIns and tCho diffusion to inflammation‐driven glial alterations, we performed DW‐MRS in a volume of interest containing the corpus callosum and surrounding tissue of cuprizone‐fed mice after 6 weeks of intoxication, and evaluated the extent of astrocytic and microglial alterations using immunohistochemistry. Both mIns and tCho apparent diffusion coefficients were significantly elevated in cuprizone‐fed mice compared with control mice, and histologic evaluation confirmed the presence of severe inflammation. Additionally, mIns and tCho diffusion showed, respectively, strong and moderate correlations with histological measures of astrocytic and microglial area fractions, confirming DW‐MRS as a promising tool for specific detection of glial changes under pathological conditions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Better cellular specificity might be achieved by measuring the diffusion of cell-specific endogenous metabolites with magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
“However, better cellular specificity might be achieved by measuring the diffusion of cell-specific endogenous metabolites with magnetic resonance spectroscopy [511,512,513].”
From Revisiting the Pathogenesis of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (2025) · cites this paper as [512]
Cites
Matsushima, G. K., & Morell, P. (2001) · Brain Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2001.tb00385.x · Cited by 984 · see citing works
Glial response during cuprizone-induced de- and remyelination in the CNS: lessons learned
Gudi, V., Gingele, S., Skripuletz, T., & Stangel, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2014.00073 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Revisiting the Pathogenesis of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy
Bougnères, P., & Le Stunff, C. (2025) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes16050590 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Genovese, G., Palombo, M., Santin, M. D., Valette, J., Ligneul, C., Aigrot, M., Abdoulkader, N., Langui, D., Millecamps, A., Baron‐Van Evercooren, A., Stankoff, B., Lehericy, S., Petiet, A., & Branzoli, F.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University College London (GB)
- Université Paris-Sud (FR)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Institut du Cerveau (FR)
- Core Facility ICM Quant Institut du Cerveau—ICM Paris France
- Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, ICM Sorbonne Université Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225 Paris France
- Center for Neuroimaging Research—CENIR Paris Brain Institute (Institut du Cerveau—ICM) Paris France
- Corresponding author
- Branzoli, Francesca
- ORCID
- Venue
- NMR in Biomedicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-01-21
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e4480-e4480
- ISSN
- 0952-3480 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1492
- OpenAlex
- W3043706472
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- NMR in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N018702‐1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- cuprizone, neuroinflammation, glial activation, astrocytes, microglia, myo-inositol, choline-containing compounds, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance spectroscopy, apparent diffusion coefficient, corpus callosum
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Choline, Cuprizone, Female, Immunohistochemistry, Inflammation, Inositol, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neuroglia, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review