Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved preprocessing, labeling and scaling algorithms for the Weight‐Constrained Shortest Path Problem

Dumitrescu, I., Boland, N.·2003·Networks

Abstract

Much has been written on shortest path problems with weight, or resource, constraints. However, relatively little of it has provided systematic computational comparisons for a representative selection of algorithms. Furthermore, there has been almost no work showing numerical performance of scaling algorithms, although worst‐case complexity guarantees for these are well known, nor has the effectiveness of simple preprocessing techniques been fully demonstrated. Here, we provide a computational comparison of three scaling techniques and a standard label‐setting method. We also describe preprocessing techniques which take full advantage of cost and upper‐bound information that can be obtained from simple shortest path information. We show that integrating information obtained in preprocessing within the label‐setting method can lead to very substantial improvements in both memory required and run time, in some cases, by orders of magnitude. Finally, we show how the performance of the label‐setting method can be further improved by making use of all Lagrange multiplier information collected in a Lagrangean relaxation first step. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/net.10090

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dumitrescu, I., & Boland, N.
Venue
Networks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08-21
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
135-153
ISSN
  • 0028-3045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0037
OpenAlex
W2036900823
Cited by
199
References
1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.