Cited by 31Sexual Differentiation and DisordersHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesNerve injury and regeneration

Sexually dimorphic neuron number in lumbosacral dorsal root ganglia of the rat: Development and steroid regulation

Mills, Alice C., Sengelaub, Dale R.·1993·Journal of Neurobiology

Abstract

Rats possess a sexually dimorphic neuromuscular system that controls penile reflexes critical for copulation. This system includes two motor nuclei in the lumbar cord and their target musculature in the perineum. The spinal nucleus of the bulbocavernosus (SNB) and the dorsolateral nucleus (DLN) motoneuron populations and their target perineal muscles are much larger in males than in females. The sex difference in motoneuron number develops via androgen‐regulated differential cell death during the perinatal period; androgen also regulates retention of the target muscles. The developmental pattern and steroid sensitivity of peripheral afferents to the SNB/DLN motor nuclei were previously unknown. In order to characterize the peripheral sensory component of the dimorphic SNB/DLN system, the neurons of the relevant dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) were quantified in terms of number, size, and androgen sensitivity at various perinatal ages. DRG neuron number is greatest prenatally, then decreases in both sexes after birth; the timing and pattern of neuron number development are similar to those seen in the SNB and DLN. Postnatally, males have more DRG neurons than females, as a result of greater neuron death in the DRGs of females. Females treated with testosterone propionate during the perinatal period exhibit masculine development of DRG neuron number. Thus, the normal development of DRG neuron number parallels that of the SNB/DLN motor nuclei and target muscles in pattern and timing, is sexually dimorphic, and is regulated by androgen. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/neu.480241108

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mills, A. C., & Sengelaub, D. R.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Sengelaub, Dale R.
Venue
Journal of Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-11
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
1543-1553
ISSN
  • 0022-3034 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4695
OpenAlex
W2030564926
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2f32ns008917-03)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS08917)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
sexual dimorphism, dorsal root ganglia, neuron number, androgen regulation, testosterone propionate, perinatal development, neuronal cell death, lumbosacral spinal cord, penile reflexes, perineal muscles, sensory neurons, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Ganglia, Spinal, Male, Motor Neurons, Muscles, Neurons, Neurons, Afferent, Pregnancy, Sex Characteristics, Spinal Cord, Testosterone, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Muscle Development, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review