Cited by 10Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCardiac Health and Mental HealthMedication Adherence and Compliance

Exploring the potential of acceptance and commitment therapy model in self‐care behaviour in persons with heart failure

Open access
Al‐Hammouri, Mohammed Munther, Rababah, Jehad A., Aldalaykeh, Mohammed·2020·Nursing Open

Abstract

Aim: This study examined the interaction among cognitive fusion, mindfulness and committed action on the self‐care behaviour in person with heart failure as guided by the acceptance and commitment therapy model. Design: An exploratory cross‐sectional design was used. Method: Participants with heart failure from in‐patients setting (N = 165) were recruited from two major regional hospitals. Data were collected using self‐report questionnaires of the study variables and demographic characteristics. Data were analysed using Hayes SPSS process macros. Results: Based on the acceptance and commitment therapy model propositions, all main and interaction effects, except for cognitive fusion, were significant. The current study showed that the main effect of the study variables on self‐care behaviour was insufficient and adding complex interactions between these variables improved the model fit, as it was suggested by the acceptance and commitment therapy model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nop2.538

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 10

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  2. Twedell, D. (2007). Clinical updates‐heart failure. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 38(5), 198– 199. 17907662
  3. Vilardaga, R., Hayes, S. C., & Schelin, L. (2007). Philosophical, theoretical and empirical foundations of acceptance and commitment therapy. Anuario de psicología/The UB Journal of Psychology, 38(1), 117– 128.

Authors
Al‐Hammouri, M. M., Rababah, J. A., & Aldalaykeh, M.
Affiliations
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO)
Corresponding author
Al‐Hammouri, Mohammed Munther
Venue
Nursing Open
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-11
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
1560-1567
ISSN
2054-1058 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034542729
Cited by
10
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nursing Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Jordan University of Science and Technology (1802018)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, heart failure, self-care behavior, cognitive fusion, mindfulness, committed action
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Heart Failure, Humans, Self Care, Mindfulness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review