Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving cognitive development of low‐birth‐weight premature infants with the COPE program: A pilot study of the benefit of early NICU intervention with mothers

Melnyk, Bernadette Mazurek, Alpert‐Gillis, Linda, Feinstein, Nancy Fischbeck, Fairbanks, Eileen, Schultz‐Czarniak, Jaclyn, Hust, Diane, Sherman, Laura, LeMoine, Christine, Moldenhauer, Zendi, Small, Leigh, Bender, Nancee, Sinkin, MD, Robert A.·2001·Research in Nursing & Health

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a parent‐focused intervention program (COPE) on infant cognitive development and maternal coping. A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 42 mothers of low‐birth‐weight (LBW) premature infants hospitalized in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), with follow‐up at 3 months' and 6 months' corrected ages. COPE mothers received the four‐phase educational–behavioral program that began 2–4 days postbirth and continued through 1 week following discharge from the NICU. Comparison mothers received audiotaped information during the same four time frames. Results indicated that COPE infants had significantly higher mental development scores at a 3 months' corrected age (M = 100.3) than did the comparison infants (M = 93.9), and this difference widened at 6 months' corrected age, with COPE infants scoring 14 points higher. COPE mothers were significantly less stressed by the NICU sights and sounds and had significantly stronger beliefs about what behaviors and characteristics to expect from their premature infants. Findings from this study support the need for further testing of early NICU interventions with parents to determine their effectiveness on parental coping and infant developmental outcomes. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Res Nurs Health 24:373–389, 2001

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nur.1038

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Melnyk, B. M., Alpert‐Gillis, L., Feinstein, N. F., Fairbanks, E., Schultz‐Czarniak, J., Hust, D., Sherman, L., LeMoine, C., Moldenhauer, Z., Small, L., Bender, N., & Sinkin, M.
Venue
Research in Nursing & Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-10
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
373-389
ISSN
  • 0160-6891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-240X
OpenAlex
W2145362132
Cited by
194
References
2
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving cognitive development of low‐birth‐weight premature infants with the COPE program: A pilot study of the benefit of early NICU intervention with mothers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/nur.1038
The paper
Melnyk, B. M., Alpert‐Gillis, L., Feinstein, N. F., Fairbanks, E., Schultz‐Czarniak, J., Hust, D., Sherman, L., LeMoine, C., Moldenhauer, Z., Small, L., Bender, N., & Sinkin, M. (2001). Improving cognitive development of low‐birth‐weight premature infants with the COPE program: A pilot study of the benefit of early NICU intervention with mothers. Research in Nursing & Health. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.1038

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.