Biological Control of Appetite: A Daunting Complexity
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This review summarizes a portion of the discussions of an NIH Workshop (Bethesda, MD, 2015) titled "Self-Regulation of Appetite-It's Complicated," which focused on the biological aspects of appetite regulation. METHODS: This review summarizes the key biological inputs of appetite regulation and their implications for body weight regulation. RESULTS: These discussions offer an update of the long-held, rigid perspective of an "adipocentric" biological control, taking a broader view that also includes important inputs from the digestive tract, from lean mass, and from the chemical sensory systems underlying taste and smell. It is only beginning to be understood how these biological systems are integrated and how this integrated input influences appetite and food eating behaviors. The relevance of these biological inputs was discussed primarily in the context of obesity and the problem of weight regain, touching on topics related to the biological predisposition for obesity and the impact that obesity treatments (dieting, exercise, bariatric surgery, etc.) might have on appetite and weight loss maintenance. Finally considered is a common theme that pervaded the workshop discussions, which was individual variability. CONCLUSIONS: It is this individual variability in the predisposition for obesity and in the biological response to weight loss that makes the biological component of appetite regulation so complicated. When this individual biological variability is placed in the context of the diverse environmental and behavioral pressures that also influence food eating behaviors, it is easy to appreciate the daunting complexities that arise with the self-regulation of appetite.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maintaining weight loss requires substantial effort as patients experience biological and environmental pressures to regain weight.
“Maintaining weight loss requires substantial effort as patients experience biological and environmental pressures to regain weight (74).”
From Behavioral Interventions to Attenuate Driven Overeating and Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery (2022) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 101 · Cited by 140
- Authors
- MacLean, P. S., Blundell, J. E., Mennella, J. A., & Batterham, R. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Monell Chemical Senses Center (US)
- UCL Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
- Corresponding author
- MacLean, Paul S.
- Venue
- Obesity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-23
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S8-S16
- ISSN
- 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-739X
- PMC
- PMC5407690
- OpenAlex
- W2625007078
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Obesity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P30 DK48520, P50 HD073063, R01 CA164166, R01 HD072307)
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G005524/1, BBS/B/05079)
- Rosetrees Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Keywords
- appetite regulation, body weight regulation, weight regain, obesity predisposition, weight loss maintenance, bariatric surgery, dieting, physical activity, lean body mass, taste and smell, interindividual variability, food intake behavior
- MeSH terms
- Appetite, Appetite Regulation, Body Weight, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Obesity, Exercise, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Bariatric Surgery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review