Cited by 318Obesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and Diet

Trends in Beverage Consumption Among Children and Adults, 2003‐2014

Open access
Bleich, Sara N., Vercammen, Kelsey A., Koma, Jonathan Wyatt, Li, Zhonghe·2018·Obesity

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to provide the most recent national estimates for beverage consumption among children and adults in the United States. Methods: Dietary data were collected from 18,600 children aged 2 to 19 years and from 27,652 adults aged ≥ 20 years in the 2003 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Total beverage and sugar‐sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption was measured by 24‐hour dietary recall. Results: From 2003 to 2014, per capita consumption of all beverages declined significantly among children (473.8‐312.6 calories; P < 0.001) and adults (425.0‐341.1 calories; P < 0.001). In the 2013‐2014 survey, 60.7% of children and 50.0% of adults drank SSBs on a given day, which is significantly lower than 2003‐2004, when 79.7% of children and 61.5% of adults reported drinking SSBs. From 2003 to 2014, per capita consumption of SSBs declined from 224.6 calories to 132.5 calories (P < 0.001) for children and from 190.4 calories to 137.6 calories (P < 0.001) for adults. The absolute levels for the percentage of SSB drinkers and per capita consumption of SSBs were highest among black, Mexican American, and non‐Mexican Hispanic children, adolescents, and young adults for all years of the study. Conclusions: Overall, beverage and SSB consumption declined for children and adults from 2003 to 2014. The levels of consumption are highest among black, Mexican American, and non‐Mexican Hispanic participants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.22056

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 318

Authors
Bleich, S. N., Vercammen, K. A., Koma, J. W., & Li, Z.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Bleich, Sara N.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-14
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
432-441
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2769684283
Cited by
318
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 22
FWCI
33.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2019-08-19)
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
beverage consumption, sugar-sweetened beverages, children, adults, dietary trends, per capita consumption, racial and ethnic disparities, Black children, Mexican American children, adolescents, young adults, NHANES
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Beverages, Child, Child, Preschool, Drinking Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweetening Agents, History, 21st Century, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review