Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neighborhood Typology and Cardiometabolic Pregnancy Outcomes in the Maternal Adiposity Metabolism and Stress Study

Headen, Irene, Laraia, Barbara, Coleman‐Phox, Kimberly, Vieten, Cassandra, Adler, Nancy, Epel, Elissa·2019·Obesity
DOI 10.1002/oby.22356
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess associations between neighborhood typologies classified across multiple neighborhood domains and cardiometabolic pregnancy outcomes and determine variation in effectiveness of a mindfulness‐based stress‐reduction intervention on outcomes across neighborhood types. Methods: Neighborhoods of participants in the Maternal Adiposity Metabolism and Stress (MAMAS) intervention (n = 208) were classified across dimensions of socioeconomic, food, safety, and service/resource environments using latent class analysis. The study estimated associations between neighborhood type and three cardiometabolic pregnancy outcomes—glucose tolerance (GT) during pregnancy, excessive gestational weight gain, and 6‐month postpartum weight retention (PPWR)—using marginal regression models. Interaction between neighborhood type and intervention was assessed. Results: Five neighborhood types differing across socioeconomic, food, and resource environments were identified. Compared with poor, well‐resourced neighborhoods, middle‐income neighborhoods with low resources had higher risk of impaired GT (relative risk [RR]: 4.1; 95% confidence Interval [CI]: 1.1, 15.5), and wealthy, well‐resourced neighborhoods had higher PPWR (beta: 3.9 kg; 95% CI: 0.3, 7.5). Intervention effectiveness varied across neighborhood type with wealthy, well‐resourced and poor, moderately resourced neighborhoods showing improvements in GT scores. PPWR was higher in intervention compared with control groups within wealthy, well‐resourced neighborhoods. Conclusions: Consideration of multidimensional neighborhood typologies revealed important nuances in intervention effectiveness on cardiometabolic pregnancy outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.22356

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1007/978-0-387-09488-5_24 · DOI
  2. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06357 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.ogc.2009.04.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000739 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/1471-0528.14236 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Muktabhant B, 2015, Diet or exercise, or both, for preventing excessive weight gain in pregnancy, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, CD007145
  7. Amorim Adegboye AR, 2013, Diet or exercise, or both, for weight reduction in women after childbirth, Cochrane Database Sys Rev, 2013, CD005627
  8. 10.3945/an.111.000984 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.071 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10995-013-1339-1 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.10.004 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01774.x · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s11524-007-9217-z · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.012 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.048 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10995-016-1966-4 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.02.010 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.026 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/ppe.12331 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.05.007 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.11.002 · DOI
  22. 10.1155/2013/916468 · DOI
  23. 10.1017/S1368980017001951 · DOI
  24. 10.1186/s12884-018-1757-6 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s11524-006-9094-x · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000271 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.007 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.014 · DOI
  30. Institute of Medicine/National Research Council, 2009, Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines
  31. 10.2337/dc10-S062 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318193e7b5 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.03.012 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/10511481003788745 · DOI
  35. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.060970 · DOI
  36. 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0679 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/10705511.2014.935265 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/24694452.2018.1453777 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Headen, I., Laraia, B., Coleman‐Phox, K., Vieten, C., Adler, N., & Epel, E.
Affiliations
  • Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
  • Community Health Sciences, Berkeley School of Public Health University of California Berkeley California USA
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Francisco School of Medicine University of California San Francisco California USA
  • Institute of Noetic Sciences Petaluma California USA
  • Department of Psychiatry, San Francisco School of Medicine University of California San Francisco California USA
ORCID
Headen, Irene
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-04
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
166-173
ISSN
  • 1930-7381
  • 1930-739X
DOI
10.1002/oby.22356
Cited by
18
References
5
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL097973)
  • Health Resources and Services Administration (T76MC00002)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.