Cited by 144Dietary Effects on HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiet and metabolism studies

Differential Effects of Alternate-Day Fasting Versus Daily Calorie Restriction on Insulin Resistance

Open access
Gabel, Kelsey, Kroeger, Cynthia M., Trepanowski, John F., Hoddy, Kristin K., Cienfuegos, Sofia, Kalam, Faiza, Varady, Krista A.·2019·Obesity

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effects of alternate-day fasting (ADF) with those of daily calorie restriction (CR) on body weight and glucoregulatory factors in adults with overweight or obesity and insulin resistance. METHODS: This secondary analysis examined the data of insulin-resistant individuals (n = 43) who participated in a 12-month study that compared ADF (25% energy needs on "fast days"; 125% energy needs on alternating "feast days") with CR (75% energy needs every day) and a control group regimen. RESULTS: In insulin-resistant participants, weight loss was not different between ADF (-8% ± 2%) and CR (-6% ± 1%) by month 12, relative to controls (P < 0.0001). Fat mass and BMI decreased (P < 0.05) similarly from ADF and CR. ADF produced greater decreases (P < 0.05) in fasting insulin (-52% ± 9%) and insulin resistance (-53% ± 9%) compared with CR (-14% ± 9%; -17% ± 11%) and the control regimen by month 12. Lean mass, visceral fat mass, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor α, and interleukin 6 values remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ADF may produce greater reductions in fasting insulin and insulin resistance compared with CR in insulin-resistant participants despite similar decreases in body weight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.22564

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 144

Authors
Gabel, K., Kroeger, C. M., Trepanowski, J. F., Hoddy, K. K., Cienfuegos, S., Kalam, F., & Varady, K. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Varady, Krista A.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-07-22
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
1443-1450
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2964075095
Cited by
144
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 3
FWCI
12.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL106228)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
alternate-day fasting, caloric restriction, insulin resistance, fasting insulin, weight loss, overweight, fat mass, visceral fat, lipid profile, inflammation, C-reactive protein, TNF-α, interleukin-6, blood pressure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Fasting, Female, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Caloric Restriction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review