The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benchmark Study of the Performance of Density Functional Theory for Bond Activations with (Ni,Pd)‐Based Transition‐Metal Catalysts
Open accessAbstract
The performance of 23 density functionals, including one LDA, four GGAs, three meta‐GGAs, three hybrid GGAs, eight hybrid meta‐GGAs, and ten double‐hybrid functionals, was investigated for the computation of activation energies of various covalent main‐group single bonds by four catalysts: Pd, PdCl−, PdCl 2, and Ni (all in the singlet state). A reactant complex, the barrier, and reaction energy were considered, leading to 164 energy data points for statistical analysis. Extended Gaussian AO basis sets were used in all calculations. The best functional for the complete benchmark set relative to estimated CCSD(T)/CBS reference data is PBE0‐D3, with an MAD value of 1.1 kcal mol−1 followed by PW6B95‐D3, the double hybrid PWPB95‐D3, and B3LYP‐D3 (1.9 kcal mol−1 each). The other tested hybrid meta‐GGAs perform less well (M06‐HF: 7.0 kcal mol−1; M06‐2X: 6.3 kcal mol−1; M06: 4.9 kcal mol−1) for the investigated reactions. In the Ni case, some double hybrids show larger errors due to partial breakdown of the perturbative treatment for the correlation energy in cases with difficult electronic structures (partial multi‐reference character). Only double hybrids either with very low amounts of perturbative correlation (e.g., PBE0‐DH) or that use the opposite‐spin correlation component only (e.g., PWPB95) seem to be more robust. We also investigated the effect of the D3 dispersion correction. While the barriers are not affected by this correction, significant and mostly positive results were observed for reaction energies. Furthermore, six very recently proposed double‐hybrid functionals were analyzed regarding the influence of the amount of Fock exchange as well as the type of perturbative correlation treatment. According to these results, double hybrids with <50–60 % of exact exchange and ∼30 % perturbative correlation perform best.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S., & Goerigk, L. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21759 · Cited by 28,221
Self-citationA new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Cited by
Double‐hybrid density functionals
Goerigk, L., & Grimme, S. (2014) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1193 · Cited by 396
Self-citationData-Driven Advancement of Homogeneous Nickel Catalyst Activity for Aryl Ether Cleavage
Cordova, M., Wodrich, M. D., Meyer, B., Sawatlon, B., & Corminboeuf, C. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c00774 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinmetz, M., & Grimme, S.
- Venue
- ChemistryOpen
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 115-124
- ISSN
- 2191-1363 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017404957
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benchmark Study of the Performance of Density Functional Theory for Bond Activations with (Ni,Pd)‐Based Transition‐Metal Catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/open.201300012
- The paper
- Steinmetz, M., & Grimme, S. (2013). Benchmark Study of the Performance of Density Functional Theory for Bond Activations with (Ni,Pd)‐Based Transition‐Metal Catalysts. ChemistryOpen. https://doi.org/10.1002/open.201300012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.