The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Advances in Voltammetry
Open accessAbstract
Recent progress in the theory and practice of voltammetry is surveyed and evaluated. The transformation over the last decade of the level of modelling and simulation of experiments has realised major advances such that electrochemical techniques can be fully developed and applied to real chemical problems of distinct complexity. This review focuses on the topic areas of: multistep electrochemical processes, voltammetry in ionic liquids, the development and interpretation of theories of electron transfer (Butler–Volmer and Marcus–Hush), advances in voltammetric pulse techniques, stochastic random walk models of diffusion, the influence of migration under conditions of low support, voltammetry at rough and porous electrodes, and nanoparticle electrochemistry. The review of the latter field encompasses both the study of nanoparticle‐modified electrodes, including stripping voltammetry and the new technique of ‘nano‐impacts’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, Y., Laborda, E., Tschulik, K., Damm, C., Molina, A., & Compton, R. G. (2014) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c4nr03850a · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Cited by
New Redox Strategies in Organic Synthesis by Means of Electrochemistry and Photochemistry
Liu, J., Lu, L., Wood, D., & Lin, S. (2020) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.0c00549 · Cited by 470
Roll-to-Roll Gravure Printed Electrochemical Sensors for Wearable and Medical Devices
Bariya, M., Shahpar, Z., Park, H., Sun, J., Jung, Y., Gao, W., Nyein, H. Y. Y., Liaw, T. S., Tai, L.-C., Ngo, Q. P., et al. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b02505 · Cited by 417
Espinoza, E. M., Clark, J. A., Soliman, J., Derr, J. B., Morales, M., & Vullev, V. I. (2019) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0241905jes · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Batchelor‐McAuley, C., Kätelhön, E., Barnes, E. O., Compton, R. G., Laborda, E., & Molina, A.
- Venue
- ChemistryOpen
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-20
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 224-260
- ISSN
- 2191-1363 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1518991754
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
