Cited by 34Diaspora, migration, transnational identityE-Government and Public ServicesAfrican Studies and Ethnography

Digital diasporas and governance in semi-authoritarian states: the case of the Egyptian Copts

Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M.·2005·Public Administration and Development

Abstract

This article explores the potential role of diasporas and information technology (IT) in fostering good governance in semi-authoritarian states. Following a review of the literature on good governance and information technology, the case of the Egyptian Copt community and its diaspora is explored, focusing on the activities of the U.S. Copt Association. It is argued that, whether or not it is an explicit objective, the U.S. Copt Association is supporting improved and more democratic governance in Egypt. The case confirms that heterogeneous networks of communication and people can promote good governance, even for the socially excluded and disempowered in a weakly penetrated state. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pad.364

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • External diasporic organizations have been shown, in some cases, to improve the quality of governance in home states.

    “The interventions of external diasporic organizations have also been shown, in some cases, to improve the quality of governance in home states.”

    From Non‐state authoritarianism and diaspora politics (2020) · cites this paper as Brinkerhoff 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brinkerhoff, J. M.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M.
Venue
Public Administration and Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
193-204
ISSN
  • 0271-2075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-162X
OpenAlex
W2003732687
Cited by
34
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Public Administration and Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of State
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Studies and Ethnography
Keywords
digital diaspora, good governance, information technology, diaspora networks, democratic governance, social exclusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review