Cited by 75Higher Education Research StudiesSchool Choice and PerformancePolitics, Economics, and Education Policy

Is Information Enough? The Effect of Information about Education Tax Benefits on Student Outcomes

Bergman, Peter, Denning, Jeffrey T., Manoli, Dayanand·2019·Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that tax benefits for college do not affect college enrollment. This may be because prospective students do not know about tax benefits for college or because the design of tax benefits is not conducive to affecting educational outcomes. We focus on changing awareness of tax benefits by providing information to students or prospective students. We sent e‐mails and letters to students that described tax benefits for college, and we tracked college outcomes. For all three of our samples—rising high school seniors, already enrolled students, and students who had previously applied to college but were not currently enrolled—information about tax benefits for college did not affect enrollment or reenrollment. We test whether effects vary according to information frames and found that no treatment arms changed student outcomes. We conclude that awareness is not the primary reason that tax benefits for college do not affect enrollment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pam.22131

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Awareness of the tax credits doesn't affect college enrollment for prospective or current students.

    “They find that awareness of the tax credits doesn't affect college enrollment for prospective or current students.”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Bergman, Denning, and Manoli (2019)

  • Informational interventions alone have limited impacts on college access and aid effectiveness, while interventions providing application support and/or upfront guarantees of aid eligibility without complex applications show more promising results.

    “In general, our review of this evidence indicates that informational interventions alone have limited impacts (such as, for example, the passive provision of net price calculators on college websites, or even proactive communication of eligibility for tax benefits; see, e.g., Levine, 2014;Bergman, Denning, & Manoli, 2019), while interventions that provide application support and/or provide upfront”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Bergman, Denning, & Manoli, 2019

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 53 · Cited by 75

Authors
Bergman, P., Denning, J. T., & Manoli, D.
Venue
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03-14
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
706-731
ISSN
  • 0276-8739 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6688
OpenAlex
W2921941235
Cited by
75
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
26.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
Keywords
college enrollment, information effects, information framing, student outcomes, prospective students, high school seniors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review