Nonmoney income and the elderly: The case of the tweeners
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines the degree of economic security experienced by the population aged 65 and over. Elderly people in the United States now enjoy an average degree of economic well being that is high relative to the younger population. Within that average there is variance, however. This analysis finds that elderly persons in the lower‐middle income range—within 100 and 200 percent of the poverty line—are economically more vulnerable than either those of high income or those below the poverty threshold. Virtually all of the elderly benefit from social security retirement income (OASI) and Medicare. The poor receive in addition substantial means‐tested cash and in‐kind transfers, and the well‐to‐do receive enough additional subsidies and tax‐free income to leave them better off after government intervention than before it. But those in between—the tweeners—are more likely to rent unsubsidized housing, are less likely to have non‐Medicare health subsidies, and are more likely to rely on OASI as their primary source of income. When facing economic or health problems, the only way they can improve their well being is to spend themselves down to penury and thereby qualify for means‐tested cash and in‐kind transfers, in the form of Medicuid and Supplemental Security Income. Policy implications of these findings are discussed in closing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The 2030 Problem: Caring for Aging Baby Boomers
Knickman, J. R., & Snell, E. K. (2002) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0560.2002.56.x · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Social Security and the Evolution of Elderly Poverty
Engelhardt, G., & Gruber, J. (2004) · NBER Working Paper · doi:10.3386/w10466 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smeeding, T. M.
- Corresponding author
- Smeeding, Timothy M.
- ORCID
- Smeeding, Timothy M.
- Venue
- Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 707-724
- ISSN
- 0276-8739 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6688
- OpenAlex
- W2150129495
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (publishedVersion)
- Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Keywords
- low-income elderly, economic vulnerability, Medicare, means-tested transfers, Supplemental Security Income, Medicare Part D, housing subsidies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review